Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Being adversarial to the FRA is a dead end street.

Kelly
December 15, 2002 07:26AM
You said, “I am retired from a career in management of a major railroad and I learned over the years that management of all railroad never gave their specification to the ICC or FRA and that government agency has no authority to ask for them.”
We certainly do share our standards with the FRA at Strasburg. In fact we hold classes for FRA inspectors, 16 at a time, to teach them how to apply the new part 230 rules correctly. If “the Gods of Steam” hadn’t been working with, cooperating, and sharing their standards with the FRA at the time of the Gettysburg accident, God knows what kind of government reaction there might have been, or if any steam locomotive would be running today. Experience and common sense shows that the quickest way to get the FRA down on you is to give them the impression that you are hiding something. However, if you work with them, generally they will work with you.
You said, “It is clear there are no experienced career management railroader in this list or ones who have the foresight to see that the FRA is beyond their legal bounds.”
I am a vice president at our operation, with 24 years full time steam railroading to my credit. Moedinger, president of our operation, whose post is a few slots up has 34 years experience.
Subject Author Posted

Report On The Commission Meeting 12-09-02

roger hogan December 10, 2002 10:06AM

Re: Report On The Commission Meeting 12-09-02

Frank Martindell December 11, 2002 08:37AM

Re: Next time you are in Chama

Jay Wimer December 12, 2002 06:03AM

C&TS Comm. Has NO EXPERIENCE to estab. FRA ng spec

PRSL December 11, 2002 09:24AM

C&TS specific written standards

Mark Valerius December 11, 2002 10:35AM

Re: C&TS Comm. Has NO EXPERIENCE to estab. FRA ng

Paul D December 11, 2002 10:41AM

Re: Why not use D&RGW practice as standard? *NM*

Brian Barr December 11, 2002 12:07PM

Common Sense

Bob Keller December 11, 2002 03:42PM

Re: Much ado about nothing

Jay Wimer December 11, 2002 05:32PM

Re: C&TS Comm. Has NO EXPERIENCE to estab. FRA ng

Robby Peartree December 11, 2002 06:21PM

Re: C&TS Comm. Has NO EXPERIENCE to estab. FRA ng

PRSL December 11, 2002 07:04PM

Re: C&TS Comm. Has NO EXPERIENCE to estab. FRA ng

E December 11, 2002 08:00PM

Re: C&TS Comm. Has NO EXPERIENCE to estab. FRA ng

Gavin Hamilton December 12, 2002 02:54AM

The CTSRR and the FRA *PIC*

Jay Wimer December 12, 2002 05:29AM

what the heck,over...

jorge gigante December 12, 2002 09:32PM

Re: C&TS Comm. Has NO EXPERIENCE to estab. FRA ng

Linn W. Moedinger December 12, 2002 05:41AM

more like Fox in the Hen house

Rodger Polley December 13, 2002 10:31PM

Written stds aren't a bad thing

Steven Haworth December 12, 2002 08:46AM

Re: Written stds aren't a bad thing

Mik December 12, 2002 02:03PM

No argument there...

Steven Haworth December 12, 2002 02:11PM

Re: No argument there...

Mik December 12, 2002 09:03PM

Re: No argument there...

DvV December 13, 2002 05:08AM

The C&TS must have and use Trk. Specifications.

PRSL December 14, 2002 09:50AM

Re: The C&TS must have and use Trk. Specifications *PIC*

Greg Scholl December 14, 2002 11:41AM

Yes, and it will Endanger all NG lines,except WP&Y *NM*

PRSL December 14, 2002 04:36PM

Being adversarial to the FRA is a dead end street.

Kelly December 15, 2002 07:26AM

Why does this discussion of track get into boilers

PRSL December 15, 2002 09:14AM

Why does this discussion of track get into boilers

Kelly December 15, 2002 10:43AM

Re: Being adversarial to the FRA is a dead end str

G. W. Laepple December 15, 2002 10:25AM

Re: The C&TS must have and use Trk. Specifications

Robby Peartree December 15, 2002 08:30AM

Re: The C&TS must have and use Trk. Specifications

Earl Knoob December 15, 2002 12:54PM

Above Post Make my Case, but are off Que

PRSL December 15, 2002 03:56PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.