Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

more like Fox in the Hen house

December 13, 2002 10:31PM
Once the standards are set, ( it was witten above that "all the CTSRR has to do is live up to them), do you think for a moment that a federal beurocrat will think twice before shutting her down for "safety" sake ( or their job, more likely). Nobody wants an "unsafe" RR, but as soon as their are two different standards for two differnet RR's you've started down a very slippery slope. Oh, yeah, they'll tell you its for the public good ( and granted it is) , and they'll tell you that they want the standards to be for "your RR", but as soon as there is a problem that will cost a RR $$$$$$$, the fight will be on. So lets imagine the WP&Y having a "higher" standard than the C&TS - then one day a mudd slide causes a mountain to shift on Cumbres. If I'm the buerocrat - why not hold you to the higher standard? I mean, that WILL BE the final outcome, because your federal government will not have the man power or resources to repond to a hundred different "narrow gauge" standards. What to do? Well, how about condense the standards and make one big standard. Thats right - now your boilers are under federal watch and regulations, ( consticting and smothering), right of way and operations are controlled buy a "forest manager" ( gasping for air ), and now your maintenance schedule, track layout , repairs, and operational standrds are controlled by another federal burocracy ( your dead, slowly but still dead). I'm not suggesting that anybody at any meeting this last week, wants anything close to a "dead RR", but they are just a bunch of small cogs in the big government machine, when they move to another department, or retire, or whatever, the standards that will have come out of this process will live forever ( and the new guy will make sure your RR lives up to it). Chickens beware, no matter how nice they are, FOX'S EAT CHICKENS. Keep them out of the hen house because federal laws, regulations, specifications, standards, or what ever you want to call them, bring with them the power of the government to "do something " to you if you break your own rule. Mark my words, at some point in the future, if this thought prevails, this board will be filled, for another entire summer, with people wondering what hit them, when a federal beurocrat causes the C&TS to not run trains again. BRACING FOR IMPACT..........
Rodger
Subject Author Posted

Report On The Commission Meeting 12-09-02

roger hogan December 10, 2002 10:06AM

Re: Report On The Commission Meeting 12-09-02

Frank Martindell December 11, 2002 08:37AM

Re: Next time you are in Chama

Jay Wimer December 12, 2002 06:03AM

C&TS Comm. Has NO EXPERIENCE to estab. FRA ng spec

PRSL December 11, 2002 09:24AM

C&TS specific written standards

Mark Valerius December 11, 2002 10:35AM

Re: C&TS Comm. Has NO EXPERIENCE to estab. FRA ng

Paul D December 11, 2002 10:41AM

Re: Why not use D&RGW practice as standard? *NM*

Brian Barr December 11, 2002 12:07PM

Common Sense

Bob Keller December 11, 2002 03:42PM

Re: Much ado about nothing

Jay Wimer December 11, 2002 05:32PM

Re: C&TS Comm. Has NO EXPERIENCE to estab. FRA ng

Robby Peartree December 11, 2002 06:21PM

Re: C&TS Comm. Has NO EXPERIENCE to estab. FRA ng

PRSL December 11, 2002 07:04PM

Re: C&TS Comm. Has NO EXPERIENCE to estab. FRA ng

E December 11, 2002 08:00PM

Re: C&TS Comm. Has NO EXPERIENCE to estab. FRA ng

Gavin Hamilton December 12, 2002 02:54AM

The CTSRR and the FRA *PIC*

Jay Wimer December 12, 2002 05:29AM

what the heck,over...

jorge gigante December 12, 2002 09:32PM

Re: C&TS Comm. Has NO EXPERIENCE to estab. FRA ng

Linn W. Moedinger December 12, 2002 05:41AM

more like Fox in the Hen house

Rodger Polley December 13, 2002 10:31PM

Written stds aren't a bad thing

Steven Haworth December 12, 2002 08:46AM

Re: Written stds aren't a bad thing

Mik December 12, 2002 02:03PM

No argument there...

Steven Haworth December 12, 2002 02:11PM

Re: No argument there...

Mik December 12, 2002 09:03PM

Re: No argument there...

DvV December 13, 2002 05:08AM

The C&TS must have and use Trk. Specifications.

PRSL December 14, 2002 09:50AM

Re: The C&TS must have and use Trk. Specifications *PIC*

Greg Scholl December 14, 2002 11:41AM

Yes, and it will Endanger all NG lines,except WP&Y *NM*

PRSL December 14, 2002 04:36PM

Being adversarial to the FRA is a dead end street.

Kelly December 15, 2002 07:26AM

Why does this discussion of track get into boilers

PRSL December 15, 2002 09:14AM

Why does this discussion of track get into boilers

Kelly December 15, 2002 10:43AM

Re: Being adversarial to the FRA is a dead end str

G. W. Laepple December 15, 2002 10:25AM

Re: The C&TS must have and use Trk. Specifications

Robby Peartree December 15, 2002 08:30AM

Re: The C&TS must have and use Trk. Specifications

Earl Knoob December 15, 2002 12:54PM

Above Post Make my Case, but are off Que

PRSL December 15, 2002 03:56PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.