Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

I am going to waffle on this one

February 26, 2003 10:13AM
Hey I can be as much of a purist as the next guy.
I agree with your statement, and can see where you fear things not going back to where they were. I too would hate to see 473 remain yellow. I never thought much of the paint scheme anyway, as it was out of the norm.
However, I do give the D&S credit for even doing it, as it tells me they ARE interested in the history of the D&RGW. Remember last year they did the green Boiler Jacket, and they removed the Bear-traps off the stacks for awhile as I remember.
Personally I find the Yellow coaches way more authentic than the C&TS coaches, and they are more attractive. Without a good appearance, there may not be any riders, and all this stuff might become scrap.
Heck on the mainline trips everyone complains that the engines run with diesel helpers, or with extra water cars that don't match. I guess you have to make a call. On the Ohio Central I have regular excursions with water cars, that are pulling riders from point A to B, and thats the way it was for those trips. Riders want to see what they rode. Last year we shot 6325 on freight runs with authentic lettering GTW, no water car, etc, and only 100 railfans saw it. I guess there is a place for both, and without the tourist and Joe rider's there isn't a train for us fans to enjoy at all.
Would I like to see San Juan cars on the C&TS...Sure. Will it happen...unlikely. You are right, historic preservation is not always accurate. Its a tough issue, and not one that has a black and white answer I am afraid.
The purist in me wants to video tape only freights on the C&TS since thats more prototypical.
However the business man in me wants to shoot the passenger runs, cause thats probably what would sell to the riders. If I am riding, the scenery is the same no matter what I am riding on!
On the D&S, what is prototypical? Well going back to the 40's they may have run pure freights, but mainly it was noted as a mixed train, before the tourist crowd.
To sum this monster up, I like you Jerry, would make everything look like the 40's or 50's if I had the chance to do so. Unfortunately, we don't have that luxury, and to survive I suppose the railroads have to take liberties with historic preservation, not only for safety, but for economic reasons. We don't have to like it and we can stay home, or we can enjoy whats there and remember how it used to be, even though its all a shadow of its former self!!
Greg, tiring of this subject Scholl
Subject Author Posted

K-28's and the Public Perception

John Hillier February 25, 2003 10:54AM

My take on the stacks

Greg Scholl February 25, 2003 12:11PM

Re: K-28's and the Public Perception *LINK*

John (K-36 487) February 25, 2003 01:34PM

Re: K-28's and the Public Perception

Charlie Mutschler February 25, 2003 08:30PM

A Rare Omission, Charlie....

Mike Trent February 25, 2003 08:50PM

Re: A Rare Omission, Charlie....

Charlie Mutschler February 25, 2003 08:57PM

not quite yet with the yellow....

John Vandenberg February 25, 2003 08:59PM

Fine Tuning......1949

Mike Trent February 26, 2003 06:51AM

Re: K-28's and the Public Perception

Mike February 25, 2003 10:37PM

Re: K-28's and the Public Perception

Fred February 25, 2003 01:53PM

Re: K-28's and the Public Perception *LINK*

John (K-36 487) February 25, 2003 02:15PM

Re: K-28's and the Public Perception

Jerry Day February 25, 2003 02:28PM

Re: K-28's and the Public Perception

Fred Beverage February 25, 2003 03:43PM

Keep it for that rainy day I'll be there! *NM*

K28DRGW February 25, 2003 11:17PM

It's History now.

William_Diehl February 25, 2003 05:36PM

Re: It's History now.

Fred February 25, 2003 07:04PM

Great News-- Bumblebee 473

Mike Trent February 25, 2003 07:31PM

Foreman Trent

Kevin Cook February 25, 2003 11:53PM

Re: Great News-- Bumblebee 473

Fred February 26, 2003 09:56AM

Re: Great News-- Bumblebee 473

Mike Trent February 26, 2003 10:04AM

Re: Great News-- Bumblebee 473

David Fluit February 26, 2003 12:22PM

Re: Great News-- Bumblebee 473

FRED February 26, 2003 03:53PM

Re: K-28's and the Public Perception

John Vandenberg February 25, 2003 08:48PM

Re: K-28's and the Public Perception

Fred February 25, 2003 09:39PM

Another way to look at it. *LINK*

Les Jarrett February 25, 2003 05:08PM

OK, Since You Asked......

Mike Trent February 25, 2003 05:18PM

Re: OK, Since You Asked......

Greg Scholl February 25, 2003 06:02PM

Ditto! *NM*

Mike Trent February 25, 2003 07:18PM

Re: OK, Since You Asked......

Jerry Day February 26, 2003 08:27AM

I am going to waffle on this one

Greg Scholl February 26, 2003 10:13AM

Re: I am going to waffle on this one

Jerry Day February 26, 2003 10:22AM

Some syrup on my waffles!

Greg Scholl February 26, 2003 12:12PM

Spring thaw

WP&Y Mike February 26, 2003 01:53PM

Re: Spring thaw *LINK*

Greg Scholl February 26, 2003 06:25PM

Re: OK, Since You Asked......

Jerry Day February 26, 2003 08:03AM

Re: OK, Since You Asked......

Jerry Day February 26, 2003 08:05AM

You're Right. Sorry.

Mike Trent February 26, 2003 08:34AM

No Problem

Jerry Day February 26, 2003 09:13AM

Historic Paint Schemes.

Chile John February 26, 2003 09:01AM

Re: K-28's and the Public Perception

Jerry Day February 25, 2003 05:55PM

Jerry, Jerry, My thoughts

K28DRGW February 25, 2003 11:45PM

Whatever

Scott Green February 26, 2003 12:21AM

K-28's and the Public Perception

John Hillier February 26, 2003 01:26AM

Loco Salvage in 1951

Charlie Mutschler February 26, 2003 07:11AM

Re: Wrecked Engines

Mike Trent February 26, 2003 07:13AM

Re: K-28's and the Public Perception

Hank Porter February 26, 2003 11:17AM

Re: K-28's and the Public Perception

eric bracher February 26, 2003 01:30PM

Re: K-28's and the Public Perception

Hank Porter February 26, 2003 02:04PM

Re: K-28's and the Public Perception

Matt Hutson February 26, 2003 02:28PM

We might all have to meet...

Kevin Cook February 26, 2003 04:19PM

How too meet and where?

K28DRGW February 26, 2003 05:11PM

Details details...

Kevin Cook February 26, 2003 05:21PM

Re: Details details...

Matt Hutson February 26, 2003 05:56PM

Re: Details details...

Greg Scholl February 26, 2003 06:30PM

Re: Details details...

Matt Hutson February 27, 2003 05:05AM

Re: Details details...

K28DRGW February 27, 2003 06:56AM

Re: Details details... *LINK*

John Craft February 27, 2003 07:20AM

Re: Details details...

Greg Scholl February 27, 2003 07:53AM

Re: what ever became of the D & S Railcamp?

Ron Keiser February 27, 2003 10:31PM

Re: D & S Railcamp good for profits.

PRSL February 28, 2003 07:13PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.