Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: The politics is HUGE

January 29, 2006 12:39PM
We are on the same page. This is pretty basic stuff for most state governments i.e. long term construction budgeting/financing. They do it all the time to build roads, bridges, etc. i.e the stuff government is supposed to be in the business of doing...
For whatever reasons the states and commission are apparently disfunctional in this regard. And yes I understand it is a bi state commission etc. but that is just one more excuse for the failure of the commission and states for 36 years now to deal effectively with this property.
This isn't rocket science. The "deal" as I understand it was the operator would pay for the operational costs from the profits of the operations (minimum of 50,000> riders and I am guessing about $2MM annual revenue)and then the states would provide the capital for track ($20MM, locomtoives $5MM, passenger equipment $2.5MM and infrastructure $3.6MM; numbers taken from the RGRPC 5 year plan)to make this all work.
So get both states to agree to underwrite an engineering and cost analysis (to verify the above numbers plus additional monies that might be needed and a contingency reserve for the unexpected that will crop up in the Rocky Mountains) Have it supervised by their respective transportation departments who hopefully have some credibility with their respective legislatures. Fund the whole thing, put it out to bid, put controls in place just like any other public works project to oversee the work. Done.
Maybe I am missing something here or maybe folks in the CO/ NM have nothing better to do than play political games with "their" 3 foot gauge train set.
One can only hope that we get some people involved that will have the political clout and long term staying power to get it done.
Subject Author Posted

Commission Meeting News *LINK*

roger hogan January 25, 2006 02:12PM

Re: Commission Meeting News

Ken Schmid January 25, 2006 03:04PM

Re: Friends proposal to operate C&TS

Rod Jensen January 25, 2006 08:34PM

Iowa Pacific Holding

Dick Seelye January 25, 2006 11:14PM

Re: Friends proposal to operate C&TS

John West January 26, 2006 09:28AM

Re: Friends proposal to operate C&TS

Rod Jensen January 26, 2006 11:16AM

Re: Friends proposal to operate C&TS

rick b January 26, 2006 12:29PM

Re: Friends proposal to operate C&TS

John West January 26, 2006 05:14PM

Re: Friends proposal to operate C&TS

Grouchy January 26, 2006 05:41PM

Re: Friends proposal to operate C&TS

Rob Gardner January 26, 2006 08:34PM

Re: Friends proposal to operate C&TS

John West January 26, 2006 09:40PM

Re: Friends proposal to operate C&TS

Scott Hightower January 27, 2006 06:41AM

Re: Friends proposal to operate C&TS

Grouchy January 27, 2006 07:41AM

Re: Friends proposal to operate C&TS

John West January 27, 2006 08:13AM

Re: Friends proposal to operate C&TS

atsfhogger3751 January 27, 2006 08:37AM

Re: Friends proposal to operate C&TS

earl January 28, 2006 02:04AM

Re: C&TS operator decision

Rod Jensen January 27, 2006 10:16PM

Re: C&TS operator decision

earl January 28, 2006 02:17AM

Re: C&TS operator decision

John Sporseen January 28, 2006 11:48AM

Re: Running the Railroad

Chris Callaway January 28, 2006 06:41AM

The politics is HUGE

John West January 28, 2006 12:30PM

Re: The politics is HUGE

Sandy January 28, 2006 01:24PM

Re: The politics is HUGE

Rod Jensen January 28, 2006 07:45PM

Re: The politics is HUGE

Burr Hubbell January 29, 2006 10:10AM

Re: The politics is HUGE

Rod Jensen January 29, 2006 10:28AM

Re: The politics is HUGE

Burr Hubbell January 29, 2006 10:49AM

Good news maybe

John West January 29, 2006 12:38PM

Re: The politics is HUGE

Rod Jensen January 29, 2006 12:39PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.