Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Some Huckleberry background

February 12, 2019 07:27PM
Ross,

When the Huckleberry Railroad was first opened in 1976, it was a mile longer than at present and included a short but steep grade. Motive power was 4-6-0 #2 (since renumbered to #152) and a Porter 2-6-0 #3. Both locos had to move right along to maintain a one hour cycle time. The #2 could handle a 10 car train but the #3 had to be flogged to manage even a five or six car train on that schedule. When the 464 was offered to the Huck, it allowed for longer trains and when winter operations began it really earned its keep. The #152 can manage a 10 or 11 car train in the winter, but it has to work hard. The 464 can handle the winter trains with ease.

In 1990 the line was shortened to the current approximately 4 mile length, all of which, with the exception of the end loops, is on the former Pere Marquette Fostoria branch grade. For a discussion of the abandoned trackage and the reasons for doing so, see NGDF Huckleberry east loop

Shortening the line has also permitted even longer trains to run in winter, with the addition of the combine, three coaches built on EBT flats and one ex Diamond and Caldor logging flat converted into an enclosed all season car. Without the 464, they would need to run somewhat shorter trains at Christmas, either giving up capacity or having to run more trains each day. Current management also feels that having an historic loco with the cachet of 464 is an asset and any attempt to replace it would probably be rebuffed.

Michael Allen
Subject Author Posted

D&RGW 464 question

Ross Miller February 12, 2019 01:29PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

Tim Schreiner February 12, 2019 01:32PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

trainrider47 February 12, 2019 01:42PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

Kelly Anderson February 12, 2019 02:11PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

jameswaite February 12, 2019 02:23PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

Ross Miller February 12, 2019 06:30PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

trainrider47 February 12, 2019 06:52PM

Re: Some Huckleberry background

trainrider47 February 12, 2019 07:27PM

Re: Some Huckleberry background

cdaspit February 13, 2019 09:16AM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

Kelly Anderson February 13, 2019 09:37AM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

BodieCalifornia February 14, 2019 12:46AM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

KevinM February 14, 2019 06:57AM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

Mark Valerius February 14, 2019 12:18PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

trainrider47 February 14, 2019 01:16PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

MSRRKevin February 12, 2019 02:32PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

michael February 12, 2019 03:29PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

KevinM February 12, 2019 04:02PM

Re: Huckleberry passenger cars too

trainrider47 February 12, 2019 04:57PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

John K February 12, 2019 04:54PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

trainrider47 February 12, 2019 05:00PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

Jeff Taylor February 12, 2019 09:53PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

Dave Vollmer February 13, 2019 08:12AM

Re: RGS 260

trainrider47 February 13, 2019 08:39AM

Re: RGS 260

KevinM February 13, 2019 08:48AM

Re: RGS 260

trainrider47 February 13, 2019 09:16AM

Re: RGS 260

Ted miles February 13, 2019 06:34PM

Re: RGS 260

Brian Norden February 13, 2019 07:07PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

Kelly Anderson February 14, 2019 05:34AM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

KevinM February 14, 2019 06:40AM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

rdamurphy February 14, 2019 03:49PM

Long?

hank April 17, 2019 07:43AM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

Kelly Anderson April 17, 2019 09:49AM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

NorthwestDaylight April 17, 2019 04:32AM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

Maury Ballstein April 17, 2019 05:37AM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

NorthwestDaylight July 14, 2019 07:05AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login