Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: D&RGW 464 question

February 12, 2019 01:42PM
464 was converted from a superheated loco to a soak by Knotts Berry Farm. It would not be suitable for either the D&S or the C&TS without some expensive modifications. The Huckleberry line is essentially level and the engine works well for them.

To get them to give up the 464 would require providing them with a suitable replacement locomotive, freshly overhauled or new built. Not too many of those available as trade bait.

Talk of "returning the 464 to its home rails" is a bit problematic. The D&RGW sold or gave the 464 to Knotts Berry Farm after sitting out of service in Durango for 10 years or so. When it needed major repairs at Knotts, they donated it to the Huckleberry RR, rather than spend the money to overhaul it. Since being on the Huckleberry, the 464 has received two major rebuilds and is well cared for. It's also permanently lettered Rio Grande, which is more than can be said for most of the ex Rio Grande locos on the D&S and C&TS. Besides, the C&TS already has a K-27 and the D&S needs more powerful locos, not one slightly less powerful than their K-28's. Or if left in it's current saturated form, a lot less powerful.

Michael Allen



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/12/2019 06:33PM by trainrider47.
Subject Author Posted

D&RGW 464 question

Ross Miller February 12, 2019 01:29PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

Tim Schreiner February 12, 2019 01:32PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

trainrider47 February 12, 2019 01:42PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

Kelly Anderson February 12, 2019 02:11PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

jameswaite February 12, 2019 02:23PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

Ross Miller February 12, 2019 06:30PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

trainrider47 February 12, 2019 06:52PM

Re: Some Huckleberry background

trainrider47 February 12, 2019 07:27PM

Re: Some Huckleberry background

cdaspit February 13, 2019 09:16AM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

Kelly Anderson February 13, 2019 09:37AM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

BodieCalifornia February 14, 2019 12:46AM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

KevinM February 14, 2019 06:57AM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

Mark Valerius February 14, 2019 12:18PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

trainrider47 February 14, 2019 01:16PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

MSRRKevin February 12, 2019 02:32PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

michael February 12, 2019 03:29PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

KevinM February 12, 2019 04:02PM

Re: Huckleberry passenger cars too

trainrider47 February 12, 2019 04:57PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

John K February 12, 2019 04:54PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

trainrider47 February 12, 2019 05:00PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

Jeff Taylor February 12, 2019 09:53PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

Dave Vollmer February 13, 2019 08:12AM

Re: RGS 260

trainrider47 February 13, 2019 08:39AM

Re: RGS 260

KevinM February 13, 2019 08:48AM

Re: RGS 260

trainrider47 February 13, 2019 09:16AM

Re: RGS 260

Ted miles February 13, 2019 06:34PM

Re: RGS 260

Brian Norden February 13, 2019 07:07PM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

Kelly Anderson February 14, 2019 05:34AM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

KevinM February 14, 2019 06:40AM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

rdamurphy February 14, 2019 03:49PM

Long?

hank April 17, 2019 07:43AM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

Kelly Anderson April 17, 2019 09:49AM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

NorthwestDaylight April 17, 2019 04:32AM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

Maury Ballstein April 17, 2019 05:37AM

Re: D&RGW 464 question

NorthwestDaylight July 14, 2019 07:05AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login