Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

December 02, 2009 12:23PM avatar
It is not possible to properly balance a small drivered (less than 50" locomotive) There isn't enough space on the driver to put enough counterwieght in there. Therefore a 44' drivered locomotive is not going to be properly counterbalanced for "high" speed. The other factor to look at is piston thrust. You can counter balance for the rods or thrust, but not both. Piston thrust makes the engine "hunt" from side to side. Engines built for high speed tend to be counterwieghted for speed and fairly rigid lead truck keeps them pointed straight ahead. This is how the N&W could get thier J's with 70" drivers to run 90mph and the SP and ATSF could get thier 4-8-4's run well over 100mph.

470's were able to run close to 50. I know guys who have been on them at 45 regularly. The scheduled passenger speed on the dual gauge south of Alamosa was about 35mph. 480's and 490's would start to hunt badly at 35 because the piston thrust would overcome the centering device on the pilot truck.
Subject Author Posted

Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

sbc1344 December 01, 2009 02:02AM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

Jeff Taylor December 01, 2009 02:18AM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

Greg Scholl December 01, 2009 07:42AM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

hank December 01, 2009 07:53AM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

Jerry Day December 01, 2009 08:47AM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

Etrump December 01, 2009 11:26AM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

bookemdanno December 01, 2009 09:18AM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

John C December 01, 2009 10:50AM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

CharlieMcCandless December 01, 2009 11:41AM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

John E. Bull December 01, 2009 08:48PM

Re: Speed on other ng lines

Brian Norden December 01, 2009 09:17PM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

BobHuddleston December 01, 2009 09:36PM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

Etrump December 01, 2009 10:24PM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

John E. Bull December 02, 2009 06:44AM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

george pearce December 02, 2009 09:58AM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

Russo Loco December 02, 2009 11:49AM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

Earl December 02, 2009 12:23PM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

Russo Loco December 03, 2009 01:45PM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

bookemdanno December 03, 2009 02:03PM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines Attachments

Russo Loco December 03, 2009 04:49PM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

bookemdanno December 03, 2009 05:29PM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

hank December 02, 2009 12:26PM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

CharlieMcCandless December 02, 2009 12:32PM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

Jerry Day December 02, 2009 12:46PM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

hank December 02, 2009 08:22PM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines Attachments

mikerowe December 02, 2009 09:36PM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

John Cole December 02, 2009 11:21PM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

dandtsrr2 December 03, 2009 01:16AM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

BrianJ December 03, 2009 08:45PM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

Russo Loco December 03, 2009 09:53PM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

Etrump December 04, 2009 12:58AM

Re: Speed on the D&RGW ng lines

jim pallow December 04, 2009 06:22PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login