Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

rod
August 10, 2007 11:49PM
Mark:

Dang, you shot my post to pieces before I was able to smoke out some of the back shop boys and get their opinions, (picks self up off of the bar room floor and dusts off the peanut shells) smiling smiley

I understand your explanations on the shops locations including the historical, political, community and other reasons why it is the way it is. I do want to understand why the Friends need to have completely separate car repair facilities though. Now if the reasoning is the operator doesn’t want the liability of a bunch of volunteers all over their shop I can understand that (I can’t stand it when my tools disappear off my bench)hot smiley But then I am thinking if one of the main purposes for the railroads existence is the economic benefit to the communities then why isn’t car repair something that the locals could be doing and getting paid for? eye rolling smiley

I count something like 170 +/- historic cars and such that the Friends are responsible for maintaining. Based on this fleet how many cars (including the wood passenger cars) will be restored in each of the Friends car shops on an annual basis in the coming years? Do the Friends have enough volunteer labor to sustain this level of restoration or would it be more productive (and economically beneficial to the community) to have a separate car shop crew contracted by the Friends working under the auspices of the operator? Please understand I am not trying to suggest that the Friends don’t do quality car restoration work or that this isn’t their responsibility. Just take an honest objective look at the tasks in the coming years (labor hours) and then think about the idea of full time carpenters/ cabinet makers etc. as an option to a part time volunteer labor pool. Now before you shoot me down again I would say the money to pay for this is going to have to come from the same types of grants and such as are used for the locomotive restorations.

Now after you have thought through the above consider then if a new combined car and locomotive backshop in Chama under the operator control could be an option worth exploring.

(Ducks behind table to avoid flying beer bottles)smiling bouncing smiley

Rod

P.S. If you are in Chama this coming week please tell John Cole to buy a round for his pole crew on me and I will reimburse him next time I am “hanging” around...smoking smiley
Subject Author Posted

C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Dave Boyer August 08, 2007 08:21AM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Darren August 08, 2007 08:54AM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Dave Boyer August 08, 2007 09:15AM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Roger Hogan August 08, 2007 09:51AM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Al Patterson August 08, 2007 04:02PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

John Craft August 08, 2007 04:08PM

The Antonito Press Correspondent

Dick Cowles August 09, 2007 11:39AM

Contact Tapia directly

CharlieMcCandless August 09, 2007 08:34PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

rod August 08, 2007 06:22PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Scott Turner August 08, 2007 07:01PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

HOD Bill August 08, 2007 07:33PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

rod August 09, 2007 01:14PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Scott Turner August 09, 2007 04:21PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

John Cole August 09, 2007 04:38PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Scott Turner August 09, 2007 06:23PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

John Bush August 09, 2007 05:28PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

rod August 09, 2007 06:53PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

michael August 09, 2007 08:21PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

Mark Valerius August 10, 2007 02:20PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

rod August 10, 2007 11:49PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

michael August 08, 2007 09:03PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Gavin Hamilton August 09, 2007 04:21AM

Curious reportage.

El Coke August 08, 2007 10:10PM

Re: Curious reportage.

Wade Hall August 09, 2007 09:40PM

Re: Curious reportage.

HOD Bill August 10, 2007 11:32AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login