Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

August 08, 2007 07:01PM avatar
Rod, a couple of things...

Quote

It is hard to understand why Exuc. Director Leo Schmitz didn’t bring up the study done by the commission that he was involved in back in 1999 which showed a $42 million economic impact to the local economies from the RR...

While I certainly second your call for the commission and its executive director to be the biggest proponents the RR has, given the obvious "quality" of reporting here, it's hard to know exactly what Mr. Schmitz (or anyone else for that matter) might or might not have said. This has the strong flavor of a reporter arranging facts to fit a pre-conceived notion.

But here's why I really broke in on the discussion:

Quote

Perhaps NM should revisit a buy-out of the CO portion of the compact as they seem to have the desire and means to do something beyond the lip service we have seen from CO.

I literally cringe everytime I hear someone suggest this as desirable. Sure, NM currently has both the political will and financial wherewithal to support the RR, but the politics and financial resources of the two states are nothing if not fluid. There have been times in the past when it was easier to get funding from Colorado, and there may well be again. I'd far rather see folks work to increase Colorado funding than to throw all of the RR's eggs into one changeable basket.

Scott



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/09/2007 07:21AM by Scott Turner.
Subject Author Posted

C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Dave Boyer August 08, 2007 08:21AM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Darren August 08, 2007 08:54AM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Dave Boyer August 08, 2007 09:15AM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Roger Hogan August 08, 2007 09:51AM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Al Patterson August 08, 2007 04:02PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

John Craft August 08, 2007 04:08PM

The Antonito Press Correspondent

Dick Cowles August 09, 2007 11:39AM

Contact Tapia directly

CharlieMcCandless August 09, 2007 08:34PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

rod August 08, 2007 06:22PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Scott Turner August 08, 2007 07:01PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

HOD Bill August 08, 2007 07:33PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

rod August 09, 2007 01:14PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Scott Turner August 09, 2007 04:21PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

John Cole August 09, 2007 04:38PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Scott Turner August 09, 2007 06:23PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

John Bush August 09, 2007 05:28PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

rod August 09, 2007 06:53PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

michael August 09, 2007 08:21PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

Mark Valerius August 10, 2007 02:20PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

rod August 10, 2007 11:49PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

michael August 08, 2007 09:03PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Gavin Hamilton August 09, 2007 04:21AM

Curious reportage.

El Coke August 08, 2007 10:10PM

Re: Curious reportage.

Wade Hall August 09, 2007 09:40PM

Re: Curious reportage.

HOD Bill August 10, 2007 11:32AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login