Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

rod
August 09, 2007 06:53PM
Hi John:

I am just trying to understand the operations from a business point of view i.e. “if you owned it” how would you run it most efficiently without regard to any political meddling? Granted a train lays over in Antonito each night currently, but is a shop for the overnight hostling of one engine a good use of limited resources? Further, are you aware that the Commission is having a new car shop built in Antonito? So now we will have 2 carshops (1 for the Friends + 1 for the Commission) and one shop/engine house in Antonito. Then we have one engine facility in Chama and the Friends propose to build a second Car shop in Chama plus 65,000 Sq. feet of covered car storage. And lest we forget while we are employing all the contractors in Rio Arriba and Conejos counties building all this stuff don’t forget the Friends new Chama Visitors center coming soon....

John, why wouldn’t it be a more efficient plan to just buy the old lumber yard property in Chama and build a first class locomotive backshop and car repair facility all in one? Seems to me like a modern facility in Chama would result in improved productivity/ through put that would rapidly return its investment in reduced operational costs vs. all the separate shops? eye rolling smiley


Rod
Subject Author Posted

C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Dave Boyer August 08, 2007 08:21AM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Darren August 08, 2007 08:54AM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Dave Boyer August 08, 2007 09:15AM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Roger Hogan August 08, 2007 09:51AM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Al Patterson August 08, 2007 04:02PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

John Craft August 08, 2007 04:08PM

The Antonito Press Correspondent

Dick Cowles August 09, 2007 11:39AM

Contact Tapia directly

CharlieMcCandless August 09, 2007 08:34PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

rod August 08, 2007 06:22PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Scott Turner August 08, 2007 07:01PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

HOD Bill August 08, 2007 07:33PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

rod August 09, 2007 01:14PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Scott Turner August 09, 2007 04:21PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

John Cole August 09, 2007 04:38PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Scott Turner August 09, 2007 06:23PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

John Bush August 09, 2007 05:28PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

rod August 09, 2007 06:53PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

michael August 09, 2007 08:21PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

Mark Valerius August 10, 2007 02:20PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

rod August 10, 2007 11:49PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

michael August 08, 2007 09:03PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Gavin Hamilton August 09, 2007 04:21AM

Curious reportage.

El Coke August 08, 2007 10:10PM

Re: Curious reportage.

Wade Hall August 09, 2007 09:40PM

Re: Curious reportage.

HOD Bill August 10, 2007 11:32AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login