Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Curious reportage.

August 08, 2007 10:10PM
The Pueblo Chieftain has given the C&TS more coverage than any other Colorado paper, but as Craft observed, they never get even the basic facts straight. I am guessing that reporters see the smoke and think there is a fire, and why not? The r.r. has had a very hard 10 years, is perceived as a money pit for the two states, and looks like a great setting for corruption. Most of us here realize that corruption is not the real problem, but a depleted infrastructure is. The reportage does not seem to be based on any investigative work, just news releases and other second-hand sources and plain hearsay. This is the way of small-town papers, even the best of 'em.

Some time ago on the forum we discussed the changing tourist patterns out West. It is sad, but the railroad has had only a limited impact on the two towns' economies over the years, with Antonito getting the smaller portion of the tourist dollar. The good news is the railroad still has the same authentic look it has always had, and if C&TS survives, it will someday be a powerful selling point. I see potential in the future of SLRG-C&TS packages as well.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/08/2007 10:14PM by El Coke.
Subject Author Posted

C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Dave Boyer August 08, 2007 08:21AM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Darren August 08, 2007 08:54AM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Dave Boyer August 08, 2007 09:15AM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Roger Hogan August 08, 2007 09:51AM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Al Patterson August 08, 2007 04:02PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

John Craft August 08, 2007 04:08PM

The Antonito Press Correspondent

Dick Cowles August 09, 2007 11:39AM

Contact Tapia directly

CharlieMcCandless August 09, 2007 08:34PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

rod August 08, 2007 06:22PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Scott Turner August 08, 2007 07:01PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

HOD Bill August 08, 2007 07:33PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

rod August 09, 2007 01:14PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Scott Turner August 09, 2007 04:21PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

John Cole August 09, 2007 04:38PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Scott Turner August 09, 2007 06:23PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

John Bush August 09, 2007 05:28PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

rod August 09, 2007 06:53PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

michael August 09, 2007 08:21PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

Mark Valerius August 10, 2007 02:20PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

rod August 10, 2007 11:49PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

michael August 08, 2007 09:03PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Gavin Hamilton August 09, 2007 04:21AM

Curious reportage.

El Coke August 08, 2007 10:10PM

Re: Curious reportage.

Wade Hall August 09, 2007 09:40PM

Re: Curious reportage.

HOD Bill August 10, 2007 11:32AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login