Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

August 09, 2007 04:21PM avatar
I wouldn't be so bold as to place a number on it, but I'm on record in this forum as having said that the economic development argument is a harder sell in Colorado than it is in NM. Nevertheless, there is still an economic argument to be made, and there are other arguments as well. And dollars have flowed to the RR from Colorado and will certainly flow in the future.

While there might be some advantages to consolidation of facilities at a single terminal, there are also dangers to consider - such as the possibility (perhaps even probability) of having a truncated RR should control revert entirely to NM. I'm one of those who likes it out on the eastern end of the line, and I sure don't want to be sitting here reminiscing with y'all about the halcyon days when trains still ran past Bighorn. It ain't all rosy in a single owner scenario.

But when all is said and done, the biggest argument against any such divestiture on the part of Colorado remains the fact that the political situations in both states are fluid, and will always be so. Santa Fe could suddenly lose interest in the face of more pressing problems and/or declining energy revenues, just as Denver could gain a key influential supporter who'd be able to ramrod funding through Colorado's JBC. These are not necessarily dreams or nightmares - simply political reality.

Enough. Off for a few badly needed days in NG heaven, ridin' and chasin' with my son. Riding from Antonito, as we always do, and hoping to always have that option.

Scott



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/09/2007 04:45PM by Scott Turner.
Subject Author Posted

C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Dave Boyer August 08, 2007 08:21AM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Darren August 08, 2007 08:54AM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Dave Boyer August 08, 2007 09:15AM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Roger Hogan August 08, 2007 09:51AM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Al Patterson August 08, 2007 04:02PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

John Craft August 08, 2007 04:08PM

The Antonito Press Correspondent

Dick Cowles August 09, 2007 11:39AM

Contact Tapia directly

CharlieMcCandless August 09, 2007 08:34PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

rod August 08, 2007 06:22PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Scott Turner August 08, 2007 07:01PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

HOD Bill August 08, 2007 07:33PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

rod August 09, 2007 01:14PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Scott Turner August 09, 2007 04:21PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

John Cole August 09, 2007 04:38PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Scott Turner August 09, 2007 06:23PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

John Bush August 09, 2007 05:28PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

rod August 09, 2007 06:53PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

michael August 09, 2007 08:21PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

Mark Valerius August 10, 2007 02:20PM

Re: C&TS Two shop facilities

rod August 10, 2007 11:49PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

michael August 08, 2007 09:03PM

Re: C&TS "Pretty but not profitable" -- Pueblo Chieftain Article

Gavin Hamilton August 09, 2007 04:21AM

Curious reportage.

El Coke August 08, 2007 10:10PM

Re: Curious reportage.

Wade Hall August 09, 2007 09:40PM

Re: Curious reportage.

HOD Bill August 10, 2007 11:32AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login