Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Not much ng , Emg Stop & Insp - 2

May 09, 2006 08:11AM
Sorry George, but on 10 MHP track, which is what the C&TS is, it is a waste of money. The crew should be able to inspect from the ground and should inspect from the rear car as the train leaves the scene.
On the UP we have track inspectors out daily (not twice weekly). The rail is ultrasounded a minimum of once every 90 days. Our Conductors are expected to inspect the track for obvious defects while they inspect their train. It's worked well for the last 30 years so I think that the UP knows their business. As for "thermal misalignments" or track damaged by an emergency stop... Here on the main line I have seen two "thermal misalignments" and no, absolutely no track damage done by an emergency stop. As I said, a waste of time and resources, especially in the C&TS case predicated on my experience.
As for the lines back East, I'm not going to venture a guess because I don't work there and don't know what kind of climatic or ground conditions they have. If they are still playing catch up from either Conrail or PC or the predecessors, I can't tell them, it's their business. As for what you've found, congratulations, but I've never seen the same from the same cause, ever.
Rick
Subject Author Posted

C&TS infrastructure has NOT badly deteriorated!

PRSL May 03, 2006 07:23PM

Re: C&TS infrastructure has NOT badly deteriorated

tom casper May 03, 2006 08:42PM

Thanks

Brian Norden May 03, 2006 11:09PM

Re: C&TS infrastructure has NOT badly deteriorated

Don Richter May 04, 2006 08:31AM

Re: C&TS infrastructure has NOT badly deteriorated

Steve Singer May 04, 2006 08:38AM

Re: C&TS infrastructure has NOT badly deteriorated

PRSL May 04, 2006 09:01AM

Re: C&TS infrastructure has NOT badly deteriorated

Bill Kepner May 04, 2006 08:55AM

Re: C&TS Ballast and cinders

PRSL May 04, 2006 09:55AM

Re: C&TS Ballast and cinders

Gavin Hamilton May 04, 2006 01:37PM

Re: C&TS Ballast and cinders *LINK*

Chris Webster May 04, 2006 05:31PM

Re: C&TS Ballast and cinders

PRSL May 04, 2006 09:17PM

Re: C&TS Ballast and cinders

frankmartindell May 05, 2006 07:22AM

Re: C&TS Ballast and cinders

Ed Stabler May 05, 2006 08:23AM

Re: C&TS Ballast and cinders

PRSL May 05, 2006 08:55PM

Re: C&TS Ballast and cinders

Rick Steele May 07, 2006 07:44AM

Re: C&TS Ballast and cinders, ES&I

PRSL May 07, 2006 07:24PM

Re: C&TS Ballast and cinders, ES&I

Rick Steele May 08, 2006 08:43AM

Re: C&TS Ballast and cinders, ES&I - 2

Rick Steele May 08, 2006 08:50AM

Re: C&TS Ballast and cinders, ES&I - 2

PRSL May 08, 2006 06:29PM

Re:Not much ng , Emg Stop & Insp - 2

PRSL May 08, 2006 06:52PM

Re: Not much ng , Emg Stop & Insp - 2

Rick Steele May 09, 2006 08:11AM

Re: Not much ng , Emg Stop & Insp - 2

Don Richter May 09, 2006 10:15AM

Re: Not much ng , Emg Stop & Insp - 2

Rick Steele May 10, 2006 06:19AM

Re: Not much ng , Emg Stop & Insp - 2

Don Richter May 10, 2006 09:41AM

Re: C&TS Ballast and cinders

Gavin Hamilton May 05, 2006 02:59AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.