Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Heritage Tourism = C&TS mission

Not so fast!!!
November 11, 2005 07:23AM
Nobody is nit-picking.
However, if you don't aim high, and set your standards at a high level, then you accept mediocrity!!!
As for the name, nobody suggested changing the name of the railroad, just the lettering on the historic equipment. It can remain the C&TS railroad on paper, who cares.
If folks are confused, thats an area the docents can rectify with explanations on the train, telling them the C&TS railroad was formed at a time when the Rio Grande name was in use, and now we can operate with equipment using the old name thanks to the cooperation of the Union Pacific, who has gratiously allowed its use for non-profit operations and for state and local owners.
Being selective means you set your standards higher to achieve the most historically accurate railroad you can.
That is no disrespect to other tourist trains that are operating various engines and equipment. Each type of operation has its place,
and they do what they must to survive.
Rod Jensen hit the nail on head. The C&TS commission should consider some paint for relettering and re-invent themselves more historically now that the railroad needs a boast in self-esteem and publicity. Do the right thing, and it will work out in the long run.
NSF
Subject Author Posted

Heritage Tourism *LINK*

Rich Muth November 07, 2005 07:18AM

Re: Heritage Tourism

William Reed November 07, 2005 01:04PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

Russ Sperry November 07, 2005 08:19PM

Historic Lines

Historic Foamer November 08, 2005 07:55AM

Re: Historic Lines

Russ Sperry November 08, 2005 11:01AM

Re: Historic Lines

David Dewey November 08, 2005 11:04PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

Donald Foster November 08, 2005 03:28PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

Not so fast!!! November 08, 2005 03:37PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

Taylor Rush November 08, 2005 03:55PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - Add Cass, etc

Russ Sperry November 08, 2005 06:26PM

Over rehabilitation

Dick Seelye November 14, 2005 12:38AM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

Not so fast!!! November 09, 2005 08:56AM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!! *LINK*

John E. McNamara November 09, 2005 01:26PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

Not so fast!!! November 09, 2005 01:53PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

Trevor Hartford November 10, 2005 08:12PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - NOT Trying to Nit-Pick!

Russ Sperry November 09, 2005 07:16PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - NOT Trying to Nit-Pick!

Not so fast!!! November 10, 2005 07:51AM

Re: Heritage Tourism - NOT Trying to Nit-Pick!

steve stockham November 10, 2005 01:35PM

Re: Heritage Tourism = C&TS mission *LINK*

Rod Jensen November 10, 2005 05:46PM

Thanks, Rod - You hit the nail SQUARE on the head! *NM*

Russ Sperry November 10, 2005 07:07PM

Re: Heritage Tourism = C&TS mission

steve stockham November 11, 2005 06:00AM

Re: Heritage Tourism = C&TS mission

Not so fast!!! November 11, 2005 07:23AM

Re: Heritage Tourism - NOT Trying to Nit-Pick!

Philip H. Walters November 10, 2005 05:53PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

Donald Foster November 08, 2005 04:58PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

El Skonk November 08, 2005 05:23PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

Grumpy November 08, 2005 05:43PM

Interesting Paper from the UK *LINK*

Jeff A. November 11, 2005 10:45AM

Re: Interesting Paper from the UK

Gavin Hamilton November 11, 2005 01:17PM

Darjeeling Himalayan Railway

Charles November 11, 2005 07:52PM

Re: World Heritage Status

Gavin Hamilton November 12, 2005 12:57PM

Re: World Heritage Status

Charles November 12, 2005 08:23PM

Re: World Heritage Status

Gavin Hamilton November 13, 2005 11:49AM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

Jim Burrill November 09, 2005 11:03AM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

RichB November 09, 2005 11:36AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.