Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Historic Lines

November 08, 2005 11:01AM
Dear Historic Foamer -
I have been to four of the five RRs listed; all of them have enough of their original infrastructure intact to provide some feeling as to what they were like 50 years ago. Also, all of them have been in existence - though not necessarily operational - since constructed. The SVRR is a REconstruction, and from all accounts an excellent one - which is why I asked about it. The NN and the EBT are probably the most intact; Sierra's depot, I believe, was - like Silverton's - rebuilt after vandals destroyed the original. Durango is missing its coaling tower and water tank, and Antonito's facilities are all replicas. (With money tight, it's not likely the tracks will be relayed to the stone depot in town anytime soon, though I certainly hope to see this happen during my lifetime.)
My main point was intended to be that there is only a small handful of original or almost original HISTORIC steam railways out there. All of them are valuable reminders of a bygone era, and all are worthy of HERITAGE Tourism in addition to sightseeing and recreational tourism. C&TS is one of these few, and IMHO should be taking better advantage of this in its advertising, and better care to preserve this aspect when upgrading its passenger fleet, etc.
- El Curmudgeonito
Subject Author Posted

Heritage Tourism *LINK*

Rich Muth November 07, 2005 07:18AM

Re: Heritage Tourism

William Reed November 07, 2005 01:04PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

Russ Sperry November 07, 2005 08:19PM

Historic Lines

Historic Foamer November 08, 2005 07:55AM

Re: Historic Lines

Russ Sperry November 08, 2005 11:01AM

Re: Historic Lines

David Dewey November 08, 2005 11:04PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

Donald Foster November 08, 2005 03:28PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

Not so fast!!! November 08, 2005 03:37PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

Taylor Rush November 08, 2005 03:55PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - Add Cass, etc

Russ Sperry November 08, 2005 06:26PM

Over rehabilitation

Dick Seelye November 14, 2005 12:38AM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

Not so fast!!! November 09, 2005 08:56AM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!! *LINK*

John E. McNamara November 09, 2005 01:26PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

Not so fast!!! November 09, 2005 01:53PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

Trevor Hartford November 10, 2005 08:12PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - NOT Trying to Nit-Pick!

Russ Sperry November 09, 2005 07:16PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - NOT Trying to Nit-Pick!

Not so fast!!! November 10, 2005 07:51AM

Re: Heritage Tourism - NOT Trying to Nit-Pick!

steve stockham November 10, 2005 01:35PM

Re: Heritage Tourism = C&TS mission *LINK*

Rod Jensen November 10, 2005 05:46PM

Thanks, Rod - You hit the nail SQUARE on the head! *NM*

Russ Sperry November 10, 2005 07:07PM

Re: Heritage Tourism = C&TS mission

steve stockham November 11, 2005 06:00AM

Re: Heritage Tourism = C&TS mission

Not so fast!!! November 11, 2005 07:23AM

Re: Heritage Tourism - NOT Trying to Nit-Pick!

Philip H. Walters November 10, 2005 05:53PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

Donald Foster November 08, 2005 04:58PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

El Skonk November 08, 2005 05:23PM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

Grumpy November 08, 2005 05:43PM

Interesting Paper from the UK *LINK*

Jeff A. November 11, 2005 10:45AM

Re: Interesting Paper from the UK

Gavin Hamilton November 11, 2005 01:17PM

Darjeeling Himalayan Railway

Charles November 11, 2005 07:52PM

Re: World Heritage Status

Gavin Hamilton November 12, 2005 12:57PM

Re: World Heritage Status

Charles November 12, 2005 08:23PM

Re: World Heritage Status

Gavin Hamilton November 13, 2005 11:49AM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

Jim Burrill November 09, 2005 11:03AM

Re: Heritage Tourism - DUH!!!

RichB November 09, 2005 11:36AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.