Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Great Link!

August 17, 2005 02:11PM
Not telegraph carrier! Direct current (DC) with ground return.
130 to 160 volt D.C. terminal "battery" (supplied by storage cells (or a dynamo) at the telegraph main office in larger cities, and by rectifier/filter power supplies from commercial AC mains at smaller offices) was connected to each wire at each end of the line, opposite polarities facing so the total voltage "in circuit" was the total of the value of the two terminal supplies. Single wire, ground return.
After such a line is more than a few miles long, the DC resistance in the circuit earth return path approaches zero (nil, no resistance) and then the only resistance in the circuit is due to that of the series-connected instrument windings, and the line wire. Shunt resistance (leakage to earth) caused by insulation faults (broken insulators, greeen foliage touching the line, etc.
would affect the working of the line somewhat, especially in wet weather.
Ohm's Law applies fully here.
It is interesting to note the general lack of knowledge today of how ground-return telegraph wires actually operated.....of course that technology was over 140 years old when it practically ceased to exist around 30 years ago, so maybe it isn't so surprising after all.....
Read George B. Prescott's
"History, Theory & Practice of the Electric
Telegraph". (1866)
It will explain it all....old, old, fascinating
technology.....
I'm not aware of any "dynamo" ever at Chama...
The telegraph wires originally did not terminate there...they "took battery" at Alamosa W.U. (or Pueblo W.U.) and at Durango W.U. or in the case of 108 wire, originally at Silverton (prob'ly a rectifier there). After the line was cut and abandoned west of Chama, there was a
rectifier/filter 110 VDC power supply operating from commercial mains placed there to apply terminal battery on the two remaining Morse wires to Alamosa. For that short distance (100 miles or so) they could even just have been put to earth there at Chama and worked fine, but when the line got wet, it was always better to have the terminal battery evenly divided between the terminal ends of the line to avoid problems working the circuit(s) with heavy "escape" during wet weather. Especially since there were two wires on the line. Keeping battery on both wires at both ends minimized the "weather cross" problems that shunt faults (leakage to ground) caused.
Subject Author Posted

A great phone call

John West August 16, 2005 07:28PM

Re: Telegraphers bug

John Wilke August 16, 2005 11:17PM

Re: Telegraphers bug

John Cole August 18, 2005 07:51AM

Re: Telegraphers bug

John Wilke August 18, 2005 09:15AM

Re: Telegraphers bug

John Cole August 18, 2005 10:14AM

Re: Telegraphers bug

John Wilke August 18, 2005 11:41AM

Re: A great phone call *LINK* *PIC*

Gregory Raven August 17, 2005 08:42AM

Re: Great Link!

John Wilke August 17, 2005 10:24AM

Re: Great Link! *LINK* *PIC*

Gregory Raven August 17, 2005 12:05PM

Re: Great Link!

L. E. Trump August 17, 2005 03:24PM

Re: Great Link!

L. E. Trump August 17, 2005 12:17PM

Re: Great Link!

John Wilke August 17, 2005 12:28PM

Re: Great Link!

Gregory Raven August 17, 2005 12:36PM

Re: Great Link!

L. E. Trump August 17, 2005 02:11PM

Abandonment west of Chama

John West August 17, 2005 02:27PM

Re: Abandonment west of Chama

L. E. Trump August 17, 2005 02:44PM

Re: Great Link!

L. E. Trump August 17, 2005 02:53PM

Trainorders

John West August 17, 2005 03:09PM

Re: Trainorders

L. E. Trump August 17, 2005 03:40PM

Those wires *PIC*

John West August 17, 2005 04:31PM

Superb Shot there John

Greg Scholl August 17, 2005 05:21PM

Re: open wire carrier?

John Craft August 17, 2005 05:11PM

Re: another question ffrom me too!

John Wilke August 17, 2005 05:26PM

Re: another question ffrom me too! *LINK*

Greg Raven August 17, 2005 05:52PM

Re: another question ffrom me too!

L. E. Trump August 17, 2005 06:14PM

Re: another question ffrom me too!

Jim August 18, 2005 11:04AM

Re: open wire carrier?

Greg Raven August 17, 2005 05:59PM

Re: open wire carrier?

Greg Raven August 17, 2005 06:33PM

Re: open wire carrier?

Don Richter August 18, 2005 01:27PM

Re: open wire carrier?

L. E. Trump August 17, 2005 06:09PM

Re: open wire carrier?

John Craft August 18, 2005 08:04AM

Re: open wire carrier?

Philip Walters August 17, 2005 09:07PM

Re: Great Link!

Greg Raven August 17, 2005 05:41PM

Re: Great Link!

L. E. Trump August 17, 2005 06:20PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.