Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Food for thought (no pix)

June 26, 2011 10:39AM avatar
South Park, finally somebody has the same sentiment I do.

I think one big folly they did early on was the (IMHO) stupid name. Cumbres and Toltec and the stupid nicname and logo it got CATS.

There are so many reasons the D&S is world renowned by casual rail fans and non rail fans alike, yet lots of railfans have no idea the C&T exists. I have to educate people when I encounter them.

The C&T should have been named Scenic San Juan, advertising living history of the route of the famous San Juan. Along with this, having Pulman Green cars that closely resemble the originals. (With vestibules)
Yes, Im nitpicking a bit, but it would have made marketing much better and lended more to the living history.
Ads could have showed historic photos of Presidents standing at Toltec Gorge and such and showen a current photo specail, with a very similar looking train in the same spot. "Come ride into history" or some similar slogan.

Diesels would just not cut it if they replaced Steam. I was not aware of the 19 excursions for train chasing. What a neat Idea. Very similar to how the Goose runs were done when I was there in 99.

If you let your history and heritage go, what is left behind?

And the comment on not using old cars because they are too worn out.... give me a break, Knotts, the D&S, that road has the WSLC #9, the D&S and most others, all use historic equipment.
Subject Author Posted

Food for thought

MikeL June 22, 2011 10:48AM

Re: Food for thought

guymonmd June 22, 2011 11:01AM

Re: Food for thought

nedsn3 June 22, 2011 01:22PM

Re: Food for thought

nedsn3 June 22, 2011 01:23PM

Re: Food for thought

hogger42 June 22, 2011 03:19PM

Re: Food for thought

John Cole June 22, 2011 03:50PM

Re: Food for thought

hogger42 June 22, 2011 04:07PM

Re: Food for thought

weston1879 June 24, 2011 04:41PM

Re: Food for thought

Mik June 24, 2011 06:15PM

Re: Food for thought

CharlieMcCandless June 24, 2011 06:37PM

Re: Food for thought

Chris Webster June 24, 2011 07:11PM

Re: Food for thought

mikerowe June 24, 2011 08:16PM

Re: Food for thought (pics) Attachments

Russo Loco June 24, 2011 10:01PM

Re: Food for thought (pics)

CharlieMcCandless June 25, 2011 03:03AM

To keep the record straight...

gothpapa June 25, 2011 09:46PM

Re: To keep the record straight...

John Cole June 25, 2011 09:56PM

Re: To keep the record straight...

gothpapa June 25, 2011 11:03PM

Re: To keep the record straight...

Mik June 26, 2011 02:20PM

Re: Food for thought (pics)

drgwk37 June 25, 2011 08:13AM

Re: Food for thought (pics)

John Cole June 25, 2011 08:16AM

Re: Food for thought (pics) Attachments

gothpapa June 25, 2011 08:45PM

Re: Food for thought (pics)

ROW Explorer June 25, 2011 10:54PM

Re: Food for thought (pics)

gothpapa June 25, 2011 11:02PM

Re: Food for thought (pics) Attachments

ROW Explorer June 25, 2011 11:16PM

Re: Food for thought (pics)

John Cole June 26, 2011 07:18AM

Re: Food for thought

Bob Foley June 26, 2011 02:39PM

Re: Food for thought (pics)

gothpapa June 25, 2011 09:20PM

Re: Food for thought (no pix)

South Park June 26, 2011 06:46AM

Re: Food for thought (no pix)

michael June 26, 2011 09:39AM

Re: Food for thought (no pix)

Rich Johnson June 26, 2011 10:39AM

Re: Food for thought (no pix)

michael June 26, 2011 11:17AM

Re: Food for thought (no pix)

Mik June 26, 2011 04:03PM

Re: Food for thought (no pix)

South Park June 26, 2011 11:57PM

Re: Food for thought (no pix)

Steve Forney June 27, 2011 07:03AM

Re: Food for thought (no pix)

South Park June 27, 2011 10:17AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login