Re: Property Information

rod Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Roger:
>
> I am confused now about the property ownership.
> Refering to your scans of the Commission 1994
> plans the location marked #3 which I believe is
> still a vacant lot directly accross from your
> hotel and directly uphill from the station on
> Terrace Avenue. If this is not owned by the
> Commission then why was it designated for future
> development (2005) in the Commission plan? It also
> appears to lie within what looks like a property
> boundary on the drawing. Please clarify if you
> know the answer(s) the overall lot size of this
> location and if it has town or state squatter
> rights for the parking that occurs there now.
>
> Rod

Location #3 is a railroad and Village of Chama park. The agreement for this use was done when the downtown project was done.It has new trees,picnic table, Brick walkways. a couple of sculptures & the large red Chama clock. I was and am surprised at how much use the park gets. This area on the North side is very narrow so there wasn't a lot of things could of been done with it especially when you add parking to the formula.