Thanks Robin. I am aware of that avenue. We do have quite a bit of protection built into the system. That being said, what set me off was the previous poster's suggestion which would result in a major alteration of an historic structure - protection or no. One would think, and hope, that this attitude is dead and buried. Apparently it is alive and well.
To illustrate the seriousness of this question, quite a few years ago the NPS was approached with the idea of that body taking over the C&TS and operate it as a National Park. They declined, stating they wouldn't touch it as the historical fabric of the line had already been too badly compromised. Now in truth, that may have been an attempt to cover up financial inadequacies without angering too many people. But that was their position.
About the same time, Dr. Myra Ellen Jenkins, NM State Historian voiced pretty much the same sentiments.
The point I am making is protection of historic properties is taken very seriously, as well it should.
For the record, I am all in favor of some sort of visitors center/museum being built. But what I am objecting to is the location - not the concept. After all, visitors centers/museums are a common sight at numerous National Parks, so the concept is pretty well accepted in historical circles. And there is much to be gained by having a venue whereby the historical story of the C&TS can be told. But let's choose our words very carefully when considering what should or should not be done. Otherwise, you can turn into a lightning rod.
I'm not trying to discourage anyone from making suggestions which may affect the historical fabric of the C&TS, but when you do so you had better be wearing a Nomex suit and wearing an historians hat.
CJ
