Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Eureka

August 15, 2005 09:11AM
Kelly,
You are correct. It would seem that there could have been a miscommunication and that the request was not needed under the circumstances. However, what happened was that I was called by the FRA and specifically told "you cannot operate in Durango." That sounded pretty clear to me and left no room for misunderstanding.
Also, you are correct in that the removal of the tubes is to allow for an inspection. I do not have any disagreement with the rule and think for a locomotive that has accumulated the allowed service time or a substantial amount of that time it should indeed be checked out.
The situation here, as you note, concerns a boiler with minimal time on the tubes, that has been boiler washed far more than is necessary, is thoroughly dried and stored in a very dry climate. The question is, should the rule have some leeway under those circumstances or should the rule be absolute. If absolute, then what of a locomotive that is restored, operated one day, and then stored properly for 15 years indoors. Should all the tubes have to be pulled for an inspection and removal of scale that could not have possibly accumulated?
As for the current tubes in Eureka, all inspectors have known when the tubes were put in. And I did in fact write the FRA about them. We are now coming up on the 15 years from when installed. The inspectors have been very reasonable in that regard. The current type of request for waiver would be made at the 15 year period in 2015 even if the tubes were put in the year 2000, assuming all other factors remained the same. If the FRA disallows the waiver, that is certainly within their power, and I will abide by their decision. If they deny it, as I mentioned earlier, then the questions becomes whether I will go through the expense to re tube just to operate one week per year on a railroad under the FRA. It does not make a lot of practical sense to do so. That is the reason for the waiver request.
You observations are very good, and I too have thought about them at length.
Dan Markoff
Subject Author Posted

Eureka

Dan Markoff August 14, 2005 12:37PM

"No Exception"?

Jim Poston August 14, 2005 12:55PM

Re: "No Exception"?

Dan Markoff August 14, 2005 01:23PM

Re: "No Exception"?

Jim Poston August 15, 2005 06:58AM

Re: "No Exception"?

Steve Eriksen August 15, 2005 07:54AM

Re: Eureka *LINK*

Chris Webster August 14, 2005 02:47PM

Re: Eureka

Ted Miles August 14, 2005 04:05PM

Re: Eureka

Dan Markoff August 14, 2005 05:42PM

Re: Eureka

Ted Miles August 15, 2005 09:29PM

Re: Eureka

Philip Walters August 14, 2005 07:41PM

Re: Eureka

Phil Reader August 14, 2005 04:49PM

Re: Eureka...here's what I wrote

Steve Eriksen August 14, 2005 10:14PM

Re: Eureka

Kelly Anderson August 15, 2005 08:26AM

Re: Eureka

Dan Markoff August 15, 2005 09:11AM

Re: Eureka

Kelly Anderson August 15, 2005 09:49AM

Re: Eureka

Greg Scholl August 15, 2005 02:33PM

Re: Eureka

Dan Markoff August 15, 2005 05:13PM

Re: Eureka

Greg Scholl August 16, 2005 09:42AM

Re: Eureka

Kyle K. Wyatt August 16, 2005 08:39PM

Re: Eureka

Philip Walters August 14, 2005 07:11PM

Re: Eureka

Jeff Chittick August 15, 2005 11:12AM

Re: Eureka

SZuiderveen August 15, 2005 11:49AM

Re: Eureka

Tom Stewart August 15, 2005 02:55PM

Re: Eureka

Stephen H. August 15, 2005 03:55PM

Re: Eureka

Jeff Chittick August 15, 2005 04:03PM

Re: Eureka

John Craft August 15, 2005 05:38PM

Re: Eureka

Steam REalist August 15, 2005 11:29PM

Re: Eureka

James French August 15, 2005 11:30PM

Re: flues and costs

John Craft August 16, 2005 06:05AM

Re: flues and costs

Jeff Chittick August 16, 2005 07:50AM

Re: flues and costs

Bob K August 16, 2005 09:20AM

Re: flues and costs

Jarvis Arp August 16, 2005 09:15PM

Re: flues and costs

Paul Hagglund August 17, 2005 10:28AM

Re: Eureka

Bob K August 16, 2005 09:12AM

Re: Eureka

John Craft August 16, 2005 06:10AM

Eureka is not the only one...

Dan Markoff August 16, 2005 10:42AM

Re: Eureka is not the only one...

Greg Scholl August 16, 2005 01:01PM

Re: Eureka is not the only one...

Earl Pitts August 16, 2005 05:37PM

Re: Eureka is not the only one...

Dan Markoff August 16, 2005 07:25PM

Re: Eureka is not the only one...

Linn W. Moedinger August 16, 2005 08:46PM

Re: Eureka is not the onlyone...

Dan Markoff August 16, 2005 09:48PM

Re: Eureka is not the onlyone...

Linn W. Moedinger August 17, 2005 06:28PM

Who are the "other ones"

Randy Hees August 17, 2005 08:27PM

Re: Who are the "other ones"

dan August 17, 2005 10:18PM

Re: Who are the "other ones" *LINK*

Randy Hees August 17, 2005 10:30PM

Re: Eureka

Austin Ray August 17, 2005 03:27PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.