Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: The #111 & What Would You Do?

February 20, 2005 04:20PM
We don’t have to accept the nonsense that the CHS is feeding the public, and in fact because many on here are more experienced with railroad operations and preservation of railroad equipment than anyone in the CHS will ever be; IMHO it is their duty to standup for what is right and historic. I do agree, the general public probably could care less what is pulling the train on the Loop or they are riding in. That doesn’t mean though that the CHS can then just do whatever they please with historic and irreplaceable equipment just to satisfy a short term problem that they created by their poor management.
Here is the bottom line on this whole thread and issue with the #111/ #9 as far as I am concerned. The #111 is probably a good choice for use on the GL based on past operations of the #40 so let’s get past this and the “historically appropriate” non-sense that CHS is publishing to justify their position. What I object to is trading away the # 9 for #111. If the CHS wants the #111 or other Colorado engines then they need to come out and just buy the damn thing and stop playing all these games with other cities. If Breckenridge wants an engine in return then CHS can go get them one in Central or South America as they are in no hurry to do anything anyway and the #111 would never be ready for the 2005 season regardless. Don’t trade away the # 9 which should be considered part of the CHS most precious assets to be restored at least cosmetically preferably operationally at some future date for use on the Loop after the immediate short term operational problems are resolved. What is really going on here is the typical CHS CYA as they know when all these expenditures eventually come out in the wash (1 + million and counting per Bell) there are going to be a lot of questions being asked of him and the CHS upper management/ BOD by the state auditors and representatives about this whole fiasco. I don’t even want to think about the fiscal impact this is going to have on Georgetown as that is a pending economic disaster for the merchants.
You can sit on your hands, complain about seeing these postings, or if you really want to do something then get to Breckenridge on Tuesday and object or support what the CHS is doing with this equipment. This is about protecting and preserving historic narrow gauge equipment, I can’t think of anything more important and needing the immediate attention of this board than this. Thank you Don Richter for facilitating this discussion/ board and having the patience, level headedness and foresight to see that out of adversity comes strength and clarity.
Rod Jensen
Subject Author Posted

CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

Rod Jensen February 18, 2005 10:55PM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

Olaf The Red February 19, 2005 04:25AM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

Daniel Maxwell February 19, 2005 08:54AM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

Rod Jensen February 19, 2005 11:51AM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

Paul Gibbs February 19, 2005 11:56AM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

Daniel Maxwell February 19, 2005 12:39PM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

Don Richter February 19, 2005 01:45PM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

John Kyler February 19, 2005 12:11PM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

Jack W. February 19, 2005 01:43PM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

Daniel Maxwell February 19, 2005 02:18PM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

A.M. Johnson February 19, 2005 02:38PM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

C. Irvin February 19, 2005 03:39PM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

Daniel Maxwell February 19, 2005 04:12PM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

C. Irvin February 19, 2005 07:36PM

Re: CHS Horse trading - #111 piece of junk

Tom Q. Vaxey February 20, 2005 10:20AM

#111: GLRR, Inc./CHS Contrast

Jim Poston February 20, 2005 10:47AM

Re: CHS agendas

Rod Jensen February 19, 2005 04:03PM

Re: CHS agendas

Daniel Maxwell February 19, 2005 04:08PM

Re: CHS agendas

Steve Stockham February 19, 2005 05:29PM

Re: CHS agendas

Daniel Maxwell February 19, 2005 05:42PM

Re: CHS agendas

Steve Stockham February 19, 2005 09:25PM

Re: CHS agendas

Dan February 20, 2005 09:14AM

Question

Ron Rudnick February 19, 2005 03:46PM

Re: Question

C. Irvin February 19, 2005 03:56PM

Re: Question

Daniel Maxwell February 19, 2005 04:04PM

Re: Question

Stephen Peck February 19, 2005 07:35PM

Re: Question

Daniel Maxwell February 19, 2005 08:22PM

Re: Question

Randy Buchter February 19, 2005 04:10PM

Re: Question

Chris Weaver February 19, 2005 06:31PM

Re: Question

Jason Midyette February 19, 2005 08:40PM

Re: Question

Randy Buchter February 20, 2005 10:19AM

Re: CHS - dead - Horse trading

Don Richter February 19, 2005 06:39PM

Re: CHS - dead - Horse trading

Rod Jensen February 19, 2005 06:54PM

Re: CHS - dead - Horse trading

Don Richter February 20, 2005 08:44AM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

El Nehi February 20, 2005 05:33AM

National Register and the Next Loop Committee Meet *LINK*

Kerry Ann February 20, 2005 11:10AM

Enough ! ! !

Ken in Buena Vista February 20, 2005 11:30AM

Right ON ! ! !

WP&Ymike February 20, 2005 01:09PM

Ahem...

Don Richter February 20, 2005 02:46PM

Re: Ahem...

WP&Ymike February 20, 2005 03:07PM

(Message Deleted by Poster)

Alan Davis February 20, 2005 08:40PM

Re:CHS/GTL

WP&Ymike February 20, 2005 09:40PM

Re: Ahem...

Daniel Maxwell February 20, 2005 09:44PM

Re: Enough ! ! !

Kerry Ann February 20, 2005 01:18PM

Kerry Ann - Get A Life

Ken in Buena Vista February 20, 2005 01:25PM

Re: Kerry Ann - Get A Life

Daniel Maxwell February 20, 2005 02:05PM

The Average Tourist

Kerry Ann February 20, 2005 04:02PM

Re: The Average Tourist

Daniel Maxwell February 20, 2005 04:03PM

Re: Kerry Ann - Get A Life

Jose Cabron February 20, 2005 07:08PM

Clarification

Kerry Ann February 20, 2005 07:51PM

Re: The #111 & What Would You Do?

Jack Ways February 20, 2005 12:45PM

Re: The #111 & What Would You Do?

Rod Jensen February 20, 2005 04:20PM

Re: The #111 & What Would You Do?

Rick Steele February 20, 2005 09:47PM

Re: The #111 & What Would You Do?

Daniel Maxwell February 20, 2005 11:57PM

Historical significance

James R. Temple February 21, 2005 01:48AM

Re: Historical significance

Daniel Maxwell February 21, 2005 01:56AM

"Preservation"

Gavin Hamilton February 21, 2005 06:29AM

Re: "Preservation"

Rick Steele February 21, 2005 07:03AM

Re: "Preservation"

Gavin Hamilton February 21, 2005 08:25AM

Why You

Jack Ways February 21, 2005 04:11AM

Re: Why You

C. Irvin February 21, 2005 11:01AM

Re: National Register and the Next Loop Committee

Steve Stockham February 20, 2005 01:32PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.