Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

February 18, 2005 10:55PM
One of the reasons many of us are so critical of the CHS is the ongoing campaign of misinformation they employ. Further, they are now attempting to trade the society’s historical assets to another entity in their quest to save face in their mismanagement of the Georgetown Loop RR Park.
Just a month ago on 1/21/05 they issued a press release detailing their plans for the parks operating equipment. This was followed by the “Open House” on 1/24/05 where presentations were also made. Even though the CHS facilities director, Joseph Bell, was in negotiations with Breckenridge to trade the C&S #9 to them for their #111 no mention was made of this fact. CHS has also apparently granted Breckenridge $300,000 without going through the normal SHF process that other entities must pass to obtain funding. The listing of current SHF funded projects that is posted on the CHS website omits the Breckenridge #111 project. Why? Breckenridge’s town council is now scheduled to act on the contract with the CHS at their Tue. 2/22/05 meeting. Isn’t the CHS chartered with preserving state historic artifacts like the C&S #9? Perhaps the CHS has become too enamored with all their gambling funded largess that they feel wheeling and dealing is the new game in town. What will be next for them to dispose of in their mad quest to meet the May 28th deadline for the park opening?
I quote Mr. Bell from the CHS 1/21/05 press release. “One of our promises to the Clear Creek community was to secure publicly owned rolling stock so it would always be a part of the park. Not only will we meet that pledge, but the historically appropriate equipment we’re bringing in helps us convey the park’s story and rich past.” So I ask you Mr. Bell, how are converted D&RGW drop bottom gondolas and the #111 from Central America “historically appropriate” to the Georgetown Loop? You sat on the C&S #9 and let it rot away in your own park and now will trade it away for another engine (#111) with absolutely no historical connection to Colorado. Perhaps the story and rich past you are referring to is the prior operator who built your RR from the ground up, no thanks to you and the CHS management. I am sure you would like to recreate the GLRR success but unfortunately you don’t stand a snowballs chance in hell.
Now the real historical question we need to answer; does Colorado still have on its books laws to deal with horse traders like are currently running the CHS? In years past stealing a man’s horse would be a capital offense punishable by hanging. What price is an iron horse?
Subject Author Posted

CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

Rod Jensen February 18, 2005 10:55PM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

Olaf The Red February 19, 2005 04:25AM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

Daniel Maxwell February 19, 2005 08:54AM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

Rod Jensen February 19, 2005 11:51AM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

Paul Gibbs February 19, 2005 11:56AM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

Daniel Maxwell February 19, 2005 12:39PM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

Don Richter February 19, 2005 01:45PM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

John Kyler February 19, 2005 12:11PM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

Jack W. February 19, 2005 01:43PM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

Daniel Maxwell February 19, 2005 02:18PM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

A.M. Johnson February 19, 2005 02:38PM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

C. Irvin February 19, 2005 03:39PM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

Daniel Maxwell February 19, 2005 04:12PM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

C. Irvin February 19, 2005 07:36PM

Re: CHS Horse trading - #111 piece of junk

Tom Q. Vaxey February 20, 2005 10:20AM

#111: GLRR, Inc./CHS Contrast

Jim Poston February 20, 2005 10:47AM

Re: CHS agendas

Rod Jensen February 19, 2005 04:03PM

Re: CHS agendas

Daniel Maxwell February 19, 2005 04:08PM

Re: CHS agendas

Steve Stockham February 19, 2005 05:29PM

Re: CHS agendas

Daniel Maxwell February 19, 2005 05:42PM

Re: CHS agendas

Steve Stockham February 19, 2005 09:25PM

Re: CHS agendas

Dan February 20, 2005 09:14AM

Question

Ron Rudnick February 19, 2005 03:46PM

Re: Question

C. Irvin February 19, 2005 03:56PM

Re: Question

Daniel Maxwell February 19, 2005 04:04PM

Re: Question

Stephen Peck February 19, 2005 07:35PM

Re: Question

Daniel Maxwell February 19, 2005 08:22PM

Re: Question

Randy Buchter February 19, 2005 04:10PM

Re: Question

Chris Weaver February 19, 2005 06:31PM

Re: Question

Jason Midyette February 19, 2005 08:40PM

Re: Question

Randy Buchter February 20, 2005 10:19AM

Re: CHS - dead - Horse trading

Don Richter February 19, 2005 06:39PM

Re: CHS - dead - Horse trading

Rod Jensen February 19, 2005 06:54PM

Re: CHS - dead - Horse trading

Don Richter February 20, 2005 08:44AM

Re: CHS Horse trading - a capital offense

El Nehi February 20, 2005 05:33AM

National Register and the Next Loop Committee Meet *LINK*

Kerry Ann February 20, 2005 11:10AM

Enough ! ! !

Ken in Buena Vista February 20, 2005 11:30AM

Right ON ! ! !

WP&Ymike February 20, 2005 01:09PM

Ahem...

Don Richter February 20, 2005 02:46PM

Re: Ahem...

WP&Ymike February 20, 2005 03:07PM

(Message Deleted by Poster)

Alan Davis February 20, 2005 08:40PM

Re:CHS/GTL

WP&Ymike February 20, 2005 09:40PM

Re: Ahem...

Daniel Maxwell February 20, 2005 09:44PM

Re: Enough ! ! !

Kerry Ann February 20, 2005 01:18PM

Kerry Ann - Get A Life

Ken in Buena Vista February 20, 2005 01:25PM

Re: Kerry Ann - Get A Life

Daniel Maxwell February 20, 2005 02:05PM

The Average Tourist

Kerry Ann February 20, 2005 04:02PM

Re: The Average Tourist

Daniel Maxwell February 20, 2005 04:03PM

Re: Kerry Ann - Get A Life

Jose Cabron February 20, 2005 07:08PM

Clarification

Kerry Ann February 20, 2005 07:51PM

Re: The #111 & What Would You Do?

Jack Ways February 20, 2005 12:45PM

Re: The #111 & What Would You Do?

Rod Jensen February 20, 2005 04:20PM

Re: The #111 & What Would You Do?

Rick Steele February 20, 2005 09:47PM

Re: The #111 & What Would You Do?

Daniel Maxwell February 20, 2005 11:57PM

Historical significance

James R. Temple February 21, 2005 01:48AM

Re: Historical significance

Daniel Maxwell February 21, 2005 01:56AM

"Preservation"

Gavin Hamilton February 21, 2005 06:29AM

Re: "Preservation"

Rick Steele February 21, 2005 07:03AM

Re: "Preservation"

Gavin Hamilton February 21, 2005 08:25AM

Why You

Jack Ways February 21, 2005 04:11AM

Re: Why You

C. Irvin February 21, 2005 11:01AM

Re: National Register and the Next Loop Committee

Steve Stockham February 20, 2005 01:32PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.