Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: CHS contract for #111

January 11, 2005 10:18AM
"Looks like Mr. Bell and CHS are going to pull the old bait and switch with the C&S #9."
Not necessarily it's worse than that.
Breckenridge will have to operate #9 in order to receive it. I don't believe they have any track to do so. However the CHS will supply "a substitute engine that will be of a cosmetic quality, similar to #111" to Brekenridge once #111 is shipped to Georgetown. What I believe the CHS is doing is buying itself time. They're taking #111 with a promise of replacing it when it's operational - which will take 18 months - 2 years. During that time all they have to do is to find a similar engine and make that one available to Breckenridge. No specifics. So they could go find some standard gauge engine and provide that to Breckenridge and still be within the bounds of the agreement.
Whether anyone in Breckenridge would give a hoot is another matter, but this whole thing appears to be more CYA than anything else.
Don
Subject Author Posted

CHS contract for #111 *LINK*

Rod Jensen January 11, 2005 12:14AM

Re: CHS contract for #111

Kerry Ann January 11, 2005 07:56AM

Re: CHS contract for #111

Stephen Peck January 11, 2005 08:07AM

Re: CHS contract for #111

John January 11, 2005 08:26AM

Re: CHS contract for #111

Jason Midyette January 11, 2005 07:52PM

Re: CHS contract for #111

Rod Jensen January 11, 2005 10:31PM

Re: CHS contract for #111

Randy Buchter January 12, 2005 07:22AM

Re: CHS contract for #111

Philip Walters January 12, 2005 08:00AM

Re: Leavenworth report *LINK*

Rod Jensen January 12, 2005 12:03PM

Clarification on Leavonworth Report

Kerry Ann January 12, 2005 06:23PM

Re: CHS contract for #111 *PIC*

Randy Hees January 11, 2005 08:26AM

Enraging....

Rodger Polley January 11, 2005 10:11PM

Re: CHS contract for #111 *LINK*

Jim Poston January 11, 2005 08:42AM

New news - CDOT & I-70 *LINK*

Stephen Peck January 11, 2005 09:07AM

Re: CHS contract for #111

Don Richter January 11, 2005 10:18AM

Re: CHS contract for #111

John January 11, 2005 10:27AM

Re: CHS contract for #111

Stephen Peck January 11, 2005 10:34AM

Re: CHS contract for #111

John January 11, 2005 11:11AM

Re: CHS contract for #111

Stephen Peck January 11, 2005 11:16AM

Re: CHS contract for #111

Dave S. January 11, 2005 11:25AM

Re: CHS contract for #111

John January 11, 2005 11:51AM

Re: CHS contract for #111

John January 11, 2005 11:46AM

Re: CHS contract for #111

Steve Graves January 11, 2005 03:21PM

Re: CHS contract for #111

John January 11, 2005 03:42PM

#71

Ed Kelley January 11, 2005 04:03PM

Re: CHS contract for #111

John January 11, 2005 12:10PM

Re: CHS contract for #111

madjack January 11, 2005 05:23PM

The Great Locomotive Trade! *LINK* *PIC*

Jeff Badger January 11, 2005 08:00PM

Re: The Great Locomotive Trade!

John January 11, 2005 08:39PM

Re: The Great Locomotive Trade!

Don Richter January 12, 2005 07:54AM

Re: The Great Locomotive Trade!

Festus January 12, 2005 08:48AM

Re: The Great Locomotive Trade!

John January 12, 2005 09:02AM

Re: The Great Locomotive Trade!

Don Richter January 12, 2005 10:08AM

Re: The Great Locomotive Trade!

Dave S. January 12, 2005 11:17AM

Re: The Great Locomotive Trade! *PIC*

Jeff Badger January 12, 2005 03:34PM

Re: The Great Locomotive Trade! *LINK* *PIC*

Jeff Badger January 12, 2005 03:49PM

Re: The Great Locomotive Trade!

Mike Stillwell January 13, 2005 09:01AM

Re; Tender

Tim Bain January 13, 2005 12:41PM

Re: Re; Tender

j.b.bane January 13, 2005 01:29PM

Re: Re; Tender

Tim Bain January 13, 2005 01:52PM

Re: ON Tender

WP&Ymike January 13, 2005 11:08PM

Re: CHS contract for #111

Rick Steele January 12, 2005 08:22AM

Re: CHS contract for #111

John January 12, 2005 08:59AM

Re: CHS contract for #111

madjack January 12, 2005 12:24PM

Re: CHS contract for #111

John January 12, 2005 12:37PM

Re: CHS contract for #111

madjack January 12, 2005 12:14PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.