Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

for arguments sake......

January 17, 2005 11:03PM
Since these guys are getting tired of trying to explain, I thought I'd keep it up for a while. While I do not pretend to be an expert Shay man, or a machinist of any kind, I have to respect what is being said by the above posters in the theory that misalignement is a long term bad thing. Working around machinists and mechanics of all sorts in the past, I have come to repect the highly experienced machinic's ability to "see" things that are wrong with a piece of machinery, without the rest of the onlookers being able to "see" what is wrong. There are two points in the above arguments that, to me at least, seem to glare out at your argument. One being the point that Lima made different castings and design's around specific parts of the locomotive, specifically because of the allignment and how those parts were affected by the guage. There was a large expense associated with engineering these parts and having them made. It does seem to me, that if all guages of Shay could have been built with either 3' or 4' 8 1/2" wheel sets, with no other changes to the chassis or engine, then Lima would have done so. Granted that a Shay's "U joints" may have taken the abuse - but to one of their other points - maybe not at peak efficiency and long life.
The other point is to the "inside vs. outside curve" argument. It seems to me that how far the "engine" portion or the Shay set in towards the wheel's alignement, would indeed have an effect on the designe and function of the drive line. If you imagine the drive line as a curve, when the Shay entered a curve, the curve would have to be "stretched" ( or vice versa "squeezed") more, IE. the length of the shaft, than if the "engine" portion of the drive line were more in line.
I would love to here a more technical, engineering point on all of this, as I am SURE, that somewhere out there, someone is mathamatically smart enough to give all of our supositions a definitive answer, but with all do respect for your opinon on this matter, it seems that your only true "evidence" are photographs. While they do give rise to your theory that as long as they are out of allignement in one plane, they can just as easily be out of alignement in two planes, they do not prove your point. I would love to see more scientific, mathimatical, enigineering, proof on this subject from both parties, as I find it intriguing. But for now, I set squarly on the side of the guys who have wrench's, calipers, and years of experince maintaining these monsters, than in a bunch of one diminsional photos on a book shelf. Yours truly - and I hope still a friend.
Rodger Polley
Subject Author Posted

New Georgetown Loop website

Ron Ruhoff January 05, 2005 04:42PM

Re: New Georgetown Loop website

byelen January 05, 2005 07:18PM

Or Underwhelmed???

Robert January 06, 2005 07:11AM

Re: Or Underwhelmed???

Wooly January 06, 2005 12:38PM

Re: New Georgetown Loop website

Kerry Ann January 05, 2005 07:30PM

Re: New Georgetown Loop website

Ron Ruhoff January 06, 2005 07:18AM

#9...*sigh*

Ed Kelley January 06, 2005 10:58AM

Re: New Georgetown Loop website

John January 05, 2005 08:43PM

Re: New Georgetown Loop website

Ed Kelley January 05, 2005 09:02PM

Re: New Georgetown Loop website

KWilcomb January 06, 2005 02:17AM

Re: New Georgetown Loop website

Towne Comee January 06, 2005 07:42AM

Re: New Georgetown Loop website

South Park January 06, 2005 10:06AM

Re: New Georgetown Loop website

Ed Kelley January 06, 2005 10:32AM

Re: New Georgetown Loop website

Ron Ruhoff January 06, 2005 10:56AM

Re: New Georgetown Loop website

Roger Mitchell January 06, 2005 11:20AM

Re: New Georgetown Loop website

Steve Stockham January 06, 2005 11:44AM

Re: New Georgetown Loop website

South Park January 06, 2005 02:16PM

Re: New Georgetown Loop website

Steve Stockham January 06, 2005 04:14PM

Re: New Georgetown Loop website

South Park January 06, 2005 05:29PM

Re: New Georgetown Loop website

Ed Kelley January 06, 2005 06:02PM

Re: New Georgetown Loop website

Karell Reader January 06, 2005 06:34PM

Re: New Georgetown Loop website

Steve Stockham January 07, 2005 05:54AM

Re: New Georgetown Loop website

Rod Jensen January 06, 2005 02:26PM

Re: New Georgetown Loop website

Bruce R. Pier January 06, 2005 03:33PM

Lowered Expections and #9

Ed Kelley January 06, 2005 03:45PM

(Message Deleted by Poster)

Alan January 07, 2005 01:29AM

Re: New Georgetown Loop website

Randy Buchter January 07, 2005 08:29AM

Re: New Georgetown Loop website

Ed Kelley January 07, 2005 03:01PM

It's not just a new operator?

Scott Hightower January 07, 2005 04:59PM

Re: It's not just a new operator?

Jim Poston January 07, 2005 08:38PM

Re: It's not just a new operator?

Scott Hightower January 08, 2005 03:40AM

Georgetown Loop GM Named...

Scott Hightower January 06, 2005 03:16PM

Re: Georgetown Loop GM Named... *LINK* *PIC*

John January 06, 2005 04:03PM

Re: Georgetown Loop GM Named... *LINK*

John January 06, 2005 04:04PM

Re: Georgetown Loop GM Named...

Bruce Yelen January 07, 2005 12:51PM

Re: Georgetown Loop GM Named...

Wooly January 07, 2005 02:39PM

Re: Georgetown Loop GM Named...

Ed Kelley January 07, 2005 03:05PM

Re: Georgetown Loop GM Named...

Bruce R. Pier January 07, 2005 03:14PM

Re: Georgetown Loop GM Named...

Ed Kelley January 07, 2005 05:09PM

Re: Georgetown Loop GM Named...

Chris Webster January 07, 2005 09:21PM

Good Background for the GM of a Mountain Railroad *LINK*

Chris Webster January 07, 2005 04:27PM

Re: Good Background for the GM of a Mountain Railr

Chris Weaver January 07, 2005 05:48PM

Re: Good Background for the GM of a Mountain Railr

Rob Mangels January 13, 2005 12:28AM

Re: Good Background for the GM of a Mountain Railr

Mike Stillwell January 13, 2005 06:02AM

Re: Good Background for the GM of a Mountain Railr

Karell Reader January 13, 2005 07:36AM

Re: Good Background for the GM of a Mountain Railr *LINK*

Jim Poston January 13, 2005 08:07AM

Re: Good Background for the GM of a Mountain Railr

Don Richter January 13, 2005 08:38AM

Re: Good Background for the GM of a Mountain Railr

Rob Mangels January 13, 2005 10:38AM

Re: Good Background for the GM of a Mountain Railr

Mike Stillwell January 13, 2005 10:44AM

Re: Mount Union

Andy Roth January 13, 2005 10:52AM

Re: Good Background for the GM of a Mountain Railr

Steve Stockham January 13, 2005 06:41PM

Re: Good Background for the GM of a Mountain Railr

Ed Kelley January 13, 2005 07:03PM

Re: Good Background for the GM of a Mountain Railr

Karell Reader January 07, 2005 07:30PM

Re: Another CLASS ACT G.M. for Historic Georgetown *LINK*

PRSL January 08, 2005 08:58AM

Re: Another CLASS ACT G.M. for Historic Georgetown

charlie January 08, 2005 09:21AM

Re: Another CLASS ACT G.M. for Historic Georgetown

Kelly January 08, 2005 09:29PM

Re: Shays

Jerry Huck January 09, 2005 01:16AM

Re: Shays *NM* *PIC*

Kelly January 09, 2005 07:27PM

Re: Okay.....

Jerry Huck January 09, 2005 07:40PM

Re: Shays-2 *NM* *PIC*

Kelly January 09, 2005 07:36PM

Wheels that fall off.....

Rodger Polley January 09, 2005 10:45PM

Re: Wheels that fall off.....

Kelly January 10, 2005 04:51PM

Re: Wheels that fall off.....

steve b January 10, 2005 08:02PM

Re: Wheels that fall off.....

Gavin Hamilton January 11, 2005 01:23PM

Re: Wheels that fall off.....

steve b January 14, 2005 09:29AM

gues I should read farther...

Rodger Polley January 09, 2005 10:48PM

re-gauging a shay...

Earl January 10, 2005 07:39AM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

PRSL January 10, 2005 07:30PM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

Kelly January 10, 2005 08:36PM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

Tom Shreve January 11, 2005 09:49AM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

Smitty January 11, 2005 09:01PM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

j.b.bane January 12, 2005 01:38PM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

Smitty January 12, 2005 01:46PM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

dan January 12, 2005 07:31PM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

j.b.bane January 12, 2005 08:19PM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

PRSL January 15, 2005 08:38AM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

earl January 15, 2005 06:12PM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

PRSL January 16, 2005 03:23PM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

madjack January 16, 2005 05:22PM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

earl January 16, 2005 07:09PM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

Rodger Polley January 17, 2005 11:10PM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

madjack January 18, 2005 08:33AM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

Mik January 18, 2005 12:01PM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

Tom Shreve January 16, 2005 08:39PM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

PRSL January 17, 2005 08:49AM

for arguments sake......

Rodger Polley January 17, 2005 11:03PM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

PRSL January 17, 2005 08:51AM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

PRSL January 21, 2005 08:00AM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

Tom Shreve January 21, 2005 08:51AM

(Message Deleted by Poster)

PRSL January 23, 2005 09:12PM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

Rodger Polley January 23, 2005 10:53PM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

PRSL January 24, 2005 06:20AM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

Lon Wall January 26, 2005 02:20PM

a note to the moderators.

Earl Knoob January 24, 2005 09:45AM

Re: Consider the Source

Mike Stillwell January 24, 2005 10:03AM

Re: a note to the moderators.

Don Richter January 24, 2005 01:29PM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

Jess VanWinkle January 21, 2005 11:25AM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

Jeff Badger January 21, 2005 08:02PM

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re-gauging a dern Shay...

jorge gigante January 21, 2005 07:53PM

Re: Re-gauging a Shay...

Chris January 22, 2005 11:43PM

Quiet!!

Skip Luke January 19, 2005 02:00PM

Re: Quiet!!

Norm Acker January 19, 2005 03:38PM

Re: Quiet!!

Jack January 19, 2005 05:38PM

Re: Quiet!!

Steve Stockham January 19, 2005 05:43PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.