Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: the rest of the story...

December 21, 2004 10:29PM
Maybe well said, but wrong. State of Colorado C&TS funds come through appropriations established by the state legislature from the general funds available to the state. The funds available to CHS come specifically from the taxes collected from gambling profits, and 28% of the taxes collected by the state from gambling are thus specifically earmarked by a constitutional amendment to go towards historic preservation, and the resultant fund is called the State Historical Fund. From that fund, as established by enabling legislation passed by the state legislature, is a system set up to award grants towards specific projects. Not included or allowed in the Fund is money for the on-going cost of operations or new non-historic structures. So before you call foul, be aware that the Fund has supported several historic preservation projects for the C&TS. All it takes is a worthy project, an application, and a match of funds normally 30% of the grant request total, and approval from a review committee made up of people from around the state.
And where does the other 72% of the gambling tax money go? Why, into the state's general fund. And the boys and girls we elect to represent us spend it on everything else the state needs, from education to whatever. Maybe even a pittance for the C&TS.
CHS funds going towards the Loop are from the pool of money available to them for historic preservation. As long as they spend money on "restoration,or preservation" i.e., the rebuilding of the equipment for operation, they are on solid ground, statute wise. But, if the funds are spent on something else, like daily operating expenses, then a gray area of some interest may develop. The internal funds generated by CHS, like from memberships, gift shop sales, admission to their properties, can be spent outside of the restrictions imposed on the Fund, but again within certain guidelines subject to audit. What ever CHS spends, at this point, is not part of the state's budget and is not otherwise available for any other uses.
Subject Author Posted

GLRR Ongoings ?

Trevor Hartford December 19, 2004 10:54AM

Re: GLRR Ongoings ?

Dan Robirds December 19, 2004 03:29PM

Re: GLRR Ongoings ?

Don Richter December 19, 2004 05:31PM

Re: GLRR Ongoings ? *LINK*

James R. Temple December 19, 2004 07:05PM

Re: GLRR Ongoings ?

John Hammond December 19, 2004 07:58PM

Re: GLRR Ongoings ?

James R. Temple December 19, 2004 10:45PM

Re: GLRR Ongoings ?

Wooly December 20, 2004 04:08AM

Another summary of the negotiations *LINK*

Don Richter December 20, 2004 08:29AM

Re: Another summary of the negotiations

Dale Brown December 20, 2004 09:49AM

Re: Another summary of the negotiations *LINK*

Scott Hightower December 20, 2004 01:05PM

Re: the rest of the story...

Rod Jensen December 20, 2004 05:51PM

Re: the rest of the story...

Michael Allen December 20, 2004 06:19PM

Re: the rest of the story...

Michael Seitz December 20, 2004 07:47PM

I respectfully disagree

roger hogan December 20, 2004 08:10PM

Re: the rest of the story...

Trevor Hartford December 21, 2004 03:01PM

(Message Deleted by Poster)

Alan Davis December 20, 2004 06:43PM

Re: the rest of the story...

Chris Webster December 20, 2004 07:46PM

Re: the rest of the story...

Wooly December 21, 2004 03:47PM

(Message Deleted by Poster)

Alan December 21, 2004 08:38PM

Re: the rest of the story...

fritz Klinke December 21, 2004 10:29PM

Re: the rest of the story...

Wooly December 22, 2004 04:39AM

Re: the rest of the story...

Chris Webster December 22, 2004 07:23AM

Re: the rest of the story...

Stephen Peck December 22, 2004 09:00AM

Re: the rest of the story...

South Park December 22, 2004 11:58AM

Re: the rest of the story...

Chris Webster December 23, 2004 09:14PM

Re: the rest of the story...

Skip Luke December 23, 2004 11:56PM

Re: the rest of the story...

Ed Kelley December 24, 2004 12:53AM

Economic Impact

RG December 21, 2004 02:29PM

Re: Another summary of the negotiations

fritz Klinke December 20, 2004 06:44PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.