Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Later Years

September 21, 2004 08:31PM
494 and 495's use in later years probably is based upon what is defined in "later years" (to me anything 1960-5 are "later years", 1966-68 was the slow painful death) and a little luck. I know that 494 and 495 were used in the early 60s, but obviously the line began an uncontrollable nosedive from the late 50s to the end. It is possible that the 494 and 495 would have been used to the end if it were not for certain events. 498 and 497 both had to get serious shop work done in 1960 after their mishap at Los Pinos. I cannot say for certain, but I’m sure their recent shop work kept them from the dead line during the early 60s retirements of the others that may have been more favored locos. (Why they were not retired or scrapped after that I am not sure, would've made sense to me, considering 482 and 490 were dead or dying in 1960) 480, 481, 486, 489, 491, 494, 495, & 499 all were retired between 1961 and 1964, or what I call the “mass retirement.” Some that ran to the end like 483 & 492 were also involved in accidents prior to or during the mass retirement of 1961-64. I am willing to bet all the recent shop work kept them running. Maybe the others, 484, 487, 488, and 493 were just better, or their remaining flue time played a factor when others were retired. I'm guessing that 482(1959) & 490(1960) were just precursors to the mass retirement of 1961-64.
Subject Author Posted

How hammered IS that locomotive ?

El Coke September 16, 2004 06:46PM

Re: How hammered IS that locomotive ?

Phil Reader September 16, 2004 10:01PM

Re: How hammered IS that locomotive ? *PIC*

Ed Kelley September 16, 2004 11:14PM

Re: How hammered IS that locomotive ?

Smokebox September 17, 2004 04:15AM

This One... *PIC*

Taylor Rush September 17, 2004 08:26AM

Re: This One...

Ed Kelley September 17, 2004 12:40PM

Re: This One...

C. Wallace September 17, 2004 07:29PM

Re: This One...Fido? *PIC*

Smokebox September 19, 2004 08:34AM

Re: How hammered IS that locomotive ?

Paul Hagglund September 18, 2004 11:07AM

Hammered locomotives

El Coke September 18, 2004 04:19PM

poor maintenance?

WP&Ymike September 18, 2004 05:11PM

Re: poor maintenance?

Paul Hagglund September 18, 2004 08:28PM

Re: poor maintenance?

fritz Klinke September 18, 2004 11:39PM

Re: poor maintenance and 483

El Coke September 19, 2004 02:15PM

Re: poor maintenance and 483

Paul Hagglund September 19, 2004 07:23PM

lemons

El Coke September 20, 2004 09:48AM

Re: lemons

Paul Hagglund September 20, 2004 07:14PM

Disliked engines

El Coke September 20, 2004 08:41PM

Re: WP&Y K-28s

WP&Ymike September 20, 2004 09:01PM

454 & the C-21's

Kevin Cook September 21, 2004 08:57AM

Bob, the C-21, and the Silverton

Josh McNeal September 21, 2004 11:17AM

Re: lemons

John Templeton-Chama Station Agent September 21, 2004 07:46AM

Re: lemons

Paul Hagglund September 21, 2004 06:26PM

485 , 490 , and 496.

El Coke September 21, 2004 07:13PM

Re: 485 , 490 , and 496.

Paul Hagglund September 21, 2004 08:11PM

Later Years

Josh McNeal September 21, 2004 08:31PM

Re: Later Years

Earl September 22, 2004 10:36AM

Re: Later Years

Josh McNeal September 22, 2004 12:07PM

Re: Later Years

Paul Hagglund September 22, 2004 05:52PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.