Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Aging a fraud-o-graph

October 17, 2017 05:35PM avatar
Tough crowd. After spending hours cloning out all the wires out I get dinged for no wires! Dang. With regard to the sharpness, some of of the digital filters reduce the sharpness but I kinda liked keeping at least the center of the photo reasonably sharp. I never thought much about why I was doing this but I certainly wasn't expecting to fool anybody. I think it boiled down to here is a digital tool, why not use it. I kinda like the result. But the feed back is appreciated. One of the things that fascinated me about the photo ops with the 18 at Laws was the "authentic" ambience of the museum grounds. Even though much has been changed, the grounds just feel old time. Most of the stuff on display as well as the building s have a patina of age that any modeler could envy. My pix seemed to capture some of that ambience, but the digital technology made them too "perfect". So "aging" the image was kind of a natural extension of the experience. But I guess I liked the sharpness too much to "age" that too much. In general I am not a fan of taking digital images and transforming them to B&W much less this aging process, but occasionally there seems to be an exception, an image that just begs for it. And it is so easy to do with all the modern digital stuff.

This is one that I thought would look good in B&W with a filter but no "aging".

SP18lawsnine1000bw.jpg

JBWX



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/17/2017 05:42PM by John West.
Subject Author Posted

Aging a fraud-o-graph Attachments

John West October 17, 2017 03:14PM

Re: Aging a fraud-o-graph

Greg Scholl October 17, 2017 03:20PM

Re: An aged phraud-o-graph . . . thumbs upthumbs up

Russo Loco October 17, 2017 07:02PM

Re: Aging a fraud-o-graph

guymonmd October 17, 2017 03:34PM

Re: Aging a fraud-o-graph

Scott Turner October 17, 2017 04:18PM

Re: Aging a fraud-o-graph

Rader Sidetrack October 17, 2017 04:47PM

Re: Aging a fraud-o-graph

Charles McMillan October 17, 2017 05:06PM

Re: Aging a fraud-o-graph Attachments

John West October 17, 2017 05:35PM

Re: Aging a fraud-o-graph

Wayne Hoskin November 07, 2017 03:31AM

Re: Aging a fraud-o-graph

et&wnc October 17, 2017 05:23PM

Re: Aging a fraud-o-graph Attachments

Chris Walker October 17, 2017 06:51PM

Re: Gnit-picking a fine fraud-o-graph . . . eye rolling smiley

Johnson Barr October 19, 2017 01:12PM

Re: An even phiner phraud-o-graph . . . thumbs upthumbs up

Russo Loco November 04, 2017 11:10PM

Re: Aging a fraud-o-graph

Greg Scholl October 19, 2017 06:20PM

Re: Aging a fraud-o-graph

Steve Thompson October 17, 2017 07:26PM

Depth of field

John West October 17, 2017 08:42PM

Re: Depth of field

Steve Thompson October 17, 2017 09:18PM

Anscochrome Attachments

John West October 17, 2017 09:33PM

Re: Aging a fraud-o-graph

rdamurphy October 17, 2017 08:24PM

Re: Aging a fraud-o-graph

dave2-8-0 October 17, 2017 10:53PM

Lens

John West October 17, 2017 11:37PM

Re: Aging a fraud-o-graph

Rich Murray October 18, 2017 07:38AM

Re: Aging a fraud-o-graph Attachments

Steve Thompson October 18, 2017 09:05AM

Re: Aging a fraud-o-graph

hudsonut1 October 18, 2017 09:39AM

Re: Aging a fraud-o-graph

John Cole October 18, 2017 08:53AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login