Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

rebuilt on the old grade

June 05, 2000 05:22PM
"Looks like any hopes or dreams of the line being rebuilt on the old grade to the DSNG are pretty much gone "
Jessica,
I know it does look like a for gone conclusion that it could not be done.
Obviously I'd like to see the old main line back in.
Practically, how would you go about it?
Who would have thought in 1970 that we would have a K-27 running today? In 1950 who would have thought we would have TWO (much less one) portion of the narrow gauge still in operation WITHOUT ever having the rails removed?
I remember a thread on the old board about doing something to preserve the old R.O.W.
If you want to keep the POSSIBILITY of connecting Durango to Chama and keeping AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE to the old grade, there are alot of plusses. The big most expensive bridges around the lake at Arboles (the lake's name escapes me right now) are still in place.
What would need to happen would be to get a "Friends of the Main Line" group together to do a survey of the grade. From that it could be determined what sections are most in danger of being lost. These would then be studied to see if either buying the land, buying the development rights of the land, or buying a railroad easement over the land on the sections affected most by development or erosion. Of course this means finding a funding source and man power.
Next, places where the old grade can not be used would need to be identified (i.e. south of the Durango yards) and examination of alternate paths to reconnect the existing segnents.
It would not be a hard job I think, just a long and tedious one.
If there is interest in trying to restore the main, the longer we wait the less likely we can reconnect the line. I'm sure the ex-Colorado Central people (i.e. Lindsey) could have alot of input on that considering what happened there.
As far as motive power, for operating the line, the D&S has 3 K-37's not in operation and the C&TS of course has 3 K-37's and a K-36. For the D&SNG to get involved, there would need to be a reasonable chance to make a profit on the operation. This might be in the form of gambling train(s) from Durango to the casino in Ignacio (if I recall correctly).
If push come to shove, 464 might be aquired and the 42 could be used on the lower grades of the Chama-Durango line.
In my opinion, if it is to be done, it should be done now. I think the effort probably would be better used for Shank's Creede operation or the three railing of the Alamosa-Antonito line, BUT I would be willing to support trying to protect the most endangered sections of the line to KEEP our options open for the future.
Subject Author Posted

Old DRGW Right of Way

Jessica Stacey May 29, 2000 02:53PM

Re: Old DRGW Right of Way

J Freeland May 29, 2000 04:25PM

Re: Old DRGW Right of Way

G. W. Laepple May 29, 2000 06:14PM

Re: Old DRGW Right of Way

Tom Stewart May 30, 2000 08:13AM

Re: Old DRGW Right of Way

B Shoup May 29, 2000 08:15PM

Re: Old DRGW Right of Way

flatlander May 30, 2000 06:10PM

Old ROWs

Mikky May 31, 2000 09:53PM

Re: Old DRGW Right of Way

Doug vV` June 02, 2000 01:29AM

rebuilt on the old grade

Doug vV June 05, 2000 05:22PM

Re: rebuilt on the old grade

Bill Malin June 06, 2000 12:52AM

Re: rebuilt on the old grade

Douglas van Veelen June 06, 2000 10:55AM

Count me in

Grant Houston June 06, 2000 02:43PM

Re: Count me in

Bill Malin June 06, 2000 04:32PM

For more info on the Re: Count me in

Doug vV June 06, 2000 07:11PM

Our motto

Grant Houston June 06, 2000 08:02PM

Re: Our motto

Bill Malin June 06, 2000 09:15PM

Friends of the San Juan Extension Main

Doug vV June 06, 2000 09:25PM

overview of project

Doug vV June 06, 2000 09:31PM

Clarification

Doug vV June 06, 2000 09:36PM

Re: Easment

Jessica Stacey June 06, 2000 11:25PM

Re: Easment

Doug vV June 06, 2000 11:44PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.