Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Dumber question

December 25, 2010 04:14PM avatar
The scheme I think you are talking about is also commonly called a "detached cylinder and reservoir". Early cars in general were of this type when they used a plain triple valve which was mounted by a heavy gauge pipe nipple to the end of the brake reservoir which was a steel tank vs. the later cast iron variety. The cylinder was plumbed separately, but could easily occupy the exact same space as the cylinder with attached reservoir and K triple, depending on if the original location would allow for the added in line length without running into a needle beam. An extant example would be the DRGW RPO that is at the Sumpter Valley which has it's original brake system with plain triple. SVRy caboose 3 had this system before restoration, but the components were practically beyond restoration for service.
Detached reservoir and cylinder systems continued to be used in the K brake era under cars that did not allow space for the lengthy combined units. The EBT hoppers are an example of this. SVRy Caboose 3 and 5 also currently have the detached K brake scheme due to space considerations.
Wabco did make a head for brake cylinders that allowed the P, H or K triple valve to be located on the brake cylinder and with the reservoir located remote and pipe connected over to the triple valve. The Bingham and Garfield business car at SVRy is an example of this with a P1 triple on the end of the brake cylinder with a pipe connection to the remote reservoir. Based on extant plugged pipe tees and a short line to nowhere I judge that this car has it's second generation brake system, having first had one with a plain triple like the above mentioned DRGW RPO.
I've thought from time to time of scanning the old WABCO parts books to share with others who may have an interest in early air brakes. Westinghouse made available a great many fairly obscure variations on the commonly seen system components.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 12/25/2010 07:16PM by J.B.Bane.
Subject Author Posted

Dumb question of the day

Bill Scobie December 25, 2010 11:02AM

Re: Dumb question of the day

Earl December 25, 2010 12:33PM

Dumber question

gbrewer December 25, 2010 02:44PM

Re: Dumber question

J.B.Bane December 25, 2010 04:14PM

Re: Dumber question Attachments

Bill Scobie December 25, 2010 06:42PM

Re: Dumber question

Keith December 25, 2010 09:14PM

Re: Dumber question

J.B.Bane December 25, 2010 09:31PM

Re: Dumber question

drgwcarman December 25, 2010 06:48PM

Re: Dumb question of the day

Russo Loco December 25, 2010 06:10PM

Re: Dumb question of the day

Bill Scobie December 25, 2010 06:49PM

Re: Dumb question of the day Attachments

Bill Scobie December 26, 2010 08:17AM

Re: Dumb question of the day

Jim Grigsby December 26, 2010 11:53AM

Re: Dumb question of the day

J.B.Bane December 26, 2010 12:12PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login