Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

PRICE QUESTION:

September 05, 2010 11:11AM
The report gives two variations of repair options with the highest priced option being $975,000. That price is said to exclude the cost of access roads, staging areas, contractor mobilization and demobilization, and permits.

So I assume that the $975,000 price includes the following:

1) The cost of engineering and design.
2) The cost of new steel components including their material and fabrication.
3) The cost of shipping these new components to Lobato.
4) The cost of erecting these new components.

I assume that the $975,000 price does not include the following:

1) The cost of removing the bridge components that will be replaced.
2) The cost of replacing the ties, rails, guard rails, and walkway.


A repair cost estimate of $2-million has been mentioned by C&TS. Since the engineering report does not mention that figure, who developed that $2-million estimate?

Is the $1,025,000 difference between the $975,000 engineer’s estimate and the $2,000,000 C&TS estimate meant to cover the cost of staging areas, contractor mobilization, demobilization, permits, removing the old bridge components, and replacing the ties, rails, guard rails, and walkway?
Subject Author Posted

Lobato Trestle Report

Roger Hogan September 02, 2010 05:57PM

No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Chris Webster September 02, 2010 08:09PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Greg Raven September 02, 2010 08:12PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Dave Boyer September 02, 2010 08:26PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Greg Raven September 02, 2010 08:34PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Dave Boyer September 02, 2010 08:53PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Chris Webster September 02, 2010 09:24PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

AGreene September 02, 2010 09:28PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Dave Boyer September 02, 2010 09:33PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

rdmstr September 02, 2010 10:30PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Abqfoamer September 03, 2010 02:07PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Chris Webster September 03, 2010 04:02PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Abqfoamer September 03, 2010 10:49PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Chris Webster September 06, 2010 09:29AM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

El Nehi September 03, 2010 11:37AM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Chris Webster September 03, 2010 04:15PM

Thank you for posting this...

Samart September 03, 2010 07:08AM

Re: Lobato Trestle Report Attachments

Rich Murray September 03, 2010 08:53AM

Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Jon Bentz September 04, 2010 11:57AM

Re: Lobato Trestle Report ...

Skip September 04, 2010 01:04PM

Re: Lobato Trestle Report ...

Paul Dalleska September 04, 2010 02:28PM

Re: Lobato Trestle Report ...

Rob Gardner September 04, 2010 02:31PM

Re: Lobato Trestle Report ...

Abqfoamer September 04, 2010 03:58PM

PRICE QUESTION:

Ron Keagle September 05, 2010 11:11AM

Re: Lobato Trestle Report ...

Chris Webster September 06, 2010 09:22AM

Re: Lobato Trestle Report ...

Greg Raven September 06, 2010 11:49AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login