Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

September 02, 2010 09:28PM avatar
As a civil engineering student, my guess is that the bridge is only long enough for an engine and 8 cars, so considering Helper engines, photo freights, etc would be irrelevant because only 8 cars would be on the trestle at any given point in time. Civil Engineers and Structural engineers are likely to say that 100 year old structures will wear out faster due to more modern usage and heavier equipment using it on a regular basis. The best thing would be to repair the parts that got damaged and possibly add some strengthening to the superstructure to make sure if something DID break on the trestle, that there was a backup in place to ensure the safety of both people and equipment.
Just my 2 cents...
Subject Author Posted

Lobato Trestle Report

Roger Hogan September 02, 2010 05:57PM

No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Chris Webster September 02, 2010 08:09PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Greg Raven September 02, 2010 08:12PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Dave Boyer September 02, 2010 08:26PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Greg Raven September 02, 2010 08:34PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Dave Boyer September 02, 2010 08:53PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Chris Webster September 02, 2010 09:24PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

AGreene September 02, 2010 09:28PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Dave Boyer September 02, 2010 09:33PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

rdmstr September 02, 2010 10:30PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Abqfoamer September 03, 2010 02:07PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Chris Webster September 03, 2010 04:02PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Abqfoamer September 03, 2010 10:49PM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Chris Webster September 06, 2010 09:29AM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

El Nehi September 03, 2010 11:37AM

Re: No consideration of the piers, abutments and foundations! Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Chris Webster September 03, 2010 04:15PM

Thank you for posting this...

Samart September 03, 2010 07:08AM

Re: Lobato Trestle Report Attachments

Rich Murray September 03, 2010 08:53AM

Re: Lobato Trestle Report

Jon Bentz September 04, 2010 11:57AM

Re: Lobato Trestle Report ...

Skip September 04, 2010 01:04PM

Re: Lobato Trestle Report ...

Paul Dalleska September 04, 2010 02:28PM

Re: Lobato Trestle Report ...

Rob Gardner September 04, 2010 02:31PM

Re: Lobato Trestle Report ...

Abqfoamer September 04, 2010 03:58PM

PRICE QUESTION:

Ron Keagle September 05, 2010 11:11AM

Re: Lobato Trestle Report ...

Chris Webster September 06, 2010 09:22AM

Re: Lobato Trestle Report ...

Greg Raven September 06, 2010 11:49AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login