Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - K-37 in future?

January 06, 2011 10:22AM
William, your point about track condition and use of K-37's is well taken. So a decision by the Commission and CTSMC to proceed to rebuild a K-37 would likely be a function of money and customer demand, not track condition.

General C&TS experience has been that ridership levels up to 55,000 or so can be covered with a motive power fleet of four locos. With completion of 463 the C&TS will have five steam locos operational, although running gear rebuild requirements are likely to mean that only four, or as few as three would be available at any given time (right now the money for such work just isn't there because of the Lobato Trestle situation).

If ridership really builds in the next several years, prudent planning would dictate that some portion of the additional revenues would go toward maintaining five locos to cover the possibility that ridership could grow beyond 55,000, but a sixth loco, a K-37 (497 or a hybrid 492/497), would not make sense until ridership were approaching 75,000 riders or more.

Since ridership for the 2009 season was only about 40,000, getting to 75,000 riders or so is a long way off (if ever). But should fortune smile upon the C&TS, the fact remains that the cost of rebuilding a K-37 to satisfy FRA requirements is likely to run at least $800,000 (or more). Much as I'd like to see a K-37 back in action, it's not likely to happen in my lifetime. However, there is no question that, should money magically appear, a K-37 could be rebuilt and returned to service.
Subject Author Posted

C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Dick Cowles April 02, 2010 03:05PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Roger Hogan April 02, 2010 03:17PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Greg Scholl April 02, 2010 03:48PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

John Bush April 03, 2010 06:30AM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Bill Pratt April 02, 2010 08:36PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Jeff Taylor April 02, 2010 11:28PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Anonymous User April 04, 2010 10:32PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Russo Loco April 05, 2010 11:27AM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Will Gant April 05, 2010 01:41PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Will Gant April 05, 2010 01:37PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Russo Loco April 05, 2010 02:40PM

Re: Rotary Snowplowers-Question for John Bush and Earl Knoob

Anonymous User April 05, 2010 09:51PM

Re: Rotary Snowplowers-Question for John Bush and Earl Knoob

John Bush April 06, 2010 06:45AM

Use it or loose it

John West April 06, 2010 09:51AM

Re: Use it or loose it Attachments

Russo Loco April 06, 2010 10:43AM

Re: Use it or loose it

BobHuddleston April 06, 2010 11:25AM

Re: Rotary Snowplowers-Question for John Bush and Earl Knoob

TonyK375 January 05, 2011 01:06PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

chamafun463 January 05, 2011 09:25PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004 Is somewhat obsolete

drgwk37 January 06, 2011 08:53AM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - K-37 in future?

Dick Cowles January 06, 2011 10:22AM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - K-37 in future?

drgwk37 January 06, 2011 12:32PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - K-37 in future?

Dick Cowles January 06, 2011 02:04PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - K-37 in future?

drgwk37 January 06, 2011 02:42PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power - a K-37 in the future? ... thumbs upthumbs up Attachments

Russo Loco January 06, 2011 03:07PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login