Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

April 05, 2010 11:27AM avatar
Jeff Taylor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Very informative, very straight forward, and it
> makes sense.

Amen, Jeff!

-------------------------------------------------------
> Interesting that 492's boiler has more modern
> seams than [497's].

... which is why placing 497's running gear under #492's boiler makes the most sense insofar as returning a K-37 to service at the least total cost is concerned.  This is well within common practices on railroads during the steam era, when keeping as many locomotives as possible in running order often meant swapping tenders, air pumps and other appliances, and yes - sometimes even frames and wheels.

Per Roger Hogan, the money we raised for #483 with his penny machines and our screen saver - about $4,500 total - will be used toward the thorough COSMETIC restoration of this engine. This will help preserve her for a possible COMPLETE restoration several years from now, when increased ridership on the C&TS will hopefully require additional motive power. In the meantime, IIRC, plans are to place her on display near the Chama depot, along with Rotary OM.

Also IIRC - per Earl Knoob, Rotary OY was "mothballed" following her last use a few years ago, and should require only minimal maintenance and lubrication* before being returned to service ...

- Russ

* and a coat of SL&RG #18's Black Jade or some Dark Olive Green Urethane on her boiler jacket!   eye rolling smiley



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 04/06/2010 01:09AM by Russo Loco.
Subject Author Posted

C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Dick Cowles April 02, 2010 03:05PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Roger Hogan April 02, 2010 03:17PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Greg Scholl April 02, 2010 03:48PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

John Bush April 03, 2010 06:30AM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Bill Pratt April 02, 2010 08:36PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Jeff Taylor April 02, 2010 11:28PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Anonymous User April 04, 2010 10:32PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Russo Loco April 05, 2010 11:27AM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Will Gant April 05, 2010 01:41PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Will Gant April 05, 2010 01:37PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Russo Loco April 05, 2010 02:40PM

Re: Rotary Snowplowers-Question for John Bush and Earl Knoob

Anonymous User April 05, 2010 09:51PM

Re: Rotary Snowplowers-Question for John Bush and Earl Knoob

John Bush April 06, 2010 06:45AM

Use it or loose it

John West April 06, 2010 09:51AM

Re: Use it or loose it Attachments

Russo Loco April 06, 2010 10:43AM

Re: Use it or loose it

BobHuddleston April 06, 2010 11:25AM

Re: Rotary Snowplowers-Question for John Bush and Earl Knoob

TonyK375 January 05, 2011 01:06PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

chamafun463 January 05, 2011 09:25PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004 Is somewhat obsolete

drgwk37 January 06, 2011 08:53AM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - K-37 in future?

Dick Cowles January 06, 2011 10:22AM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - K-37 in future?

drgwk37 January 06, 2011 12:32PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - K-37 in future?

Dick Cowles January 06, 2011 02:04PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - K-37 in future?

drgwk37 January 06, 2011 02:42PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power - a K-37 in the future? ... thumbs upthumbs up Attachments

Russo Loco January 06, 2011 03:07PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login