Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Rotary Snowplowers-Question for John Bush and Earl Knoob

April 06, 2010 06:45AM
Frank,

In answer to your question between 1990 (my first winter in Chama) and 1996 (my last winter in Chama) the OY was used 4 times. 0Y was used in 91,93,94,and 95. In 95 it broke a "half axle connecting the left side fly wheel to the bevel gear. At the same time the cylinder head on that side was broken. A new axle and cylinder head were made and applied between May 95 and April of 96. During that time we also rebuilt the super structure. The wooden superstructure frame was replaced with channel steel and nailers were bolted into the channels. Tongue and groove siding was milled and nailed on to replace the old siding. The result was that it had a stronger body than before but visually looked the same as it did during the "Rio Grande" days. At that time we painted it MOW gray and lettered it. It was ready to operate in 96 but the snow pack didn"t justify its use.

Jack Campbell who was my Master Mechanic while I was CMO became CMO when I went to Alaska. He was in charge when 0Y was used in 97. Other than one bearing running hot which he said would need a little adjustment It operated well in 97. Any rebuilding it would require now is due to the neglect of having not been used or cared for in the last 12 years.

I know there has been much comment that the rotaries should not be used again, or if so only in mid winter when the snow is fresh and not packed down. I disagree. Rotary plows were used in blizzard, drift, and avalanche conditions on Cumbres, Marshall, Boreas, Lizard Head, White Pass, Corona, Tennesse, and Donner for years. It is worthy of note that the axle that broke on the 0Y had a date stamp of 1939 on it if I recall correctly. Remember the the machine was new in 1925, and there is no reason to believe that the 1939 axle was the first replacement. These parts did break and were replaced on a continuing basis during the life of these machines. If one looks at the reports there are frequent references to snow fighting being interupted because the plows had broken down. "Service em like they serviced em, ues em like they used em, and fix em like they fixed em." To my way of thinking that is the way to preserve and interpret both the product and the process that was the historic railroad.

John Bush

PS Before I came to Chama they had removed 25 tubes from the OM's boiler for inspection. We did not work on it while I was there so I have no useful information to contribute on that subject.
Subject Author Posted

C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Dick Cowles April 02, 2010 03:05PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Roger Hogan April 02, 2010 03:17PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Greg Scholl April 02, 2010 03:48PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

John Bush April 03, 2010 06:30AM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Bill Pratt April 02, 2010 08:36PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Jeff Taylor April 02, 2010 11:28PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Anonymous User April 04, 2010 10:32PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Russo Loco April 05, 2010 11:27AM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Will Gant April 05, 2010 01:41PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Will Gant April 05, 2010 01:37PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

Russo Loco April 05, 2010 02:40PM

Re: Rotary Snowplowers-Question for John Bush and Earl Knoob

Anonymous User April 05, 2010 09:51PM

Re: Rotary Snowplowers-Question for John Bush and Earl Knoob

John Bush April 06, 2010 06:45AM

Use it or loose it

John West April 06, 2010 09:51AM

Re: Use it or loose it Attachments

Russo Loco April 06, 2010 10:43AM

Re: Use it or loose it

BobHuddleston April 06, 2010 11:25AM

Re: Rotary Snowplowers-Question for John Bush and Earl Knoob

TonyK375 January 05, 2011 01:06PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004

chamafun463 January 05, 2011 09:25PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - John Bush 2004 Is somewhat obsolete

drgwk37 January 06, 2011 08:53AM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - K-37 in future?

Dick Cowles January 06, 2011 10:22AM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - K-37 in future?

drgwk37 January 06, 2011 12:32PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - K-37 in future?

Dick Cowles January 06, 2011 02:04PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power Assessment - K-37 in future?

drgwk37 January 06, 2011 02:42PM

Re: C&TS Motive Power - a K-37 in the future? ... thumbs upthumbs up Attachments

Russo Loco January 06, 2011 03:07PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login