Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: SLSF 4-8-2 #1522

July 25, 2007 08:11AM
Bill M. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I thought the reason 1522 was parked was the cost
> of meeting the new boiler requirements--that and
> the increased cost of insurance. I believe that
> was the publicly stated reason put out by the
> Steam Train Association. I did not know about the
> problems with the lead truck. She was a beautiful
> engine when she was running.


1522 came up lame in 1998 and had to be pulled of the BNSF Employee Appreciation Special that would have seen the engine travel as far as Wyoming. It was the last straw for the group, and over that winter 1522 got a major running gear overhaul.

On its first move after the overhaul, it derailed when the 132-lb CWR on a wye in St. Louis rolled over. Hulcher lifted and dropped the loco a couple of times in the rerailing process, and the resulting damage limited 1522 to 15mph or so on a trip to Galesburg and back.

So they did it again.

The next year, I got a call from Scott Lindsay to brag that the engine was doing 50mph on its way to Galesburg and running cool - with no break-in.

We saw it in 2001 and 2002 (last trips), and while the valves were a little out-of-square, the running gear seemed to be in fine shape.

The cost of a 1472-day inspection, the cost of insurance, and the lack of opportunities to operate led to the decision to park the engine.

JAC
Subject Author Posted

La Veta Board's Action on Water

CharlieMcCandless July 21, 2007 06:47AM

Re: La Veta Board's Action on Water

szuiderveen July 21, 2007 07:30AM

Re: La Veta Board's Action on Water

Dave Bates July 21, 2007 07:58AM

Re: La Veta Board's Action on Water

Steve Singer July 21, 2007 10:20AM

Re: La Veta Board's Action on Water

Chris Webster July 21, 2007 06:20PM

Re: La Veta Board's Action on Water

Tim Schreiner July 21, 2007 07:52PM

Re: La Veta Board's Action on Water

Chris Webster July 22, 2007 09:28AM

Re: La Veta Board's Action on Water

CharlieMcCandless July 21, 2007 09:11AM

Re: La Veta Board's Action on Water

John Cole July 21, 2007 09:25AM

Re: La Veta Board's Action on Water

Robin Warren July 21, 2007 07:35AM

Re: La Veta Board's Action on Water

Max Cox July 21, 2007 08:02AM

Re: La Veta Board's Action on Water

ND Holmes July 21, 2007 10:07AM

Re: La Veta Board's Action on Water

Dave Boyer July 21, 2007 12:33PM

Maybe time to look at running to Walsenburg

Anonymous User July 21, 2007 10:24AM

Re: Maybe time to look at running to Walsenburg

hogger42 July 21, 2007 04:56PM

Re: Maybe time to look at running to Walsenburg

Ken in Buena Vista July 21, 2007 09:00PM

Re: Maybe time to look at running to Walsenburg

szuiderveen July 23, 2007 06:13AM

Re: What an idiot!

Tim Schreiner July 21, 2007 05:05PM

Re: What an idiot!

kwilcomb July 21, 2007 05:10PM

Let's keep our cool

John West July 21, 2007 09:23PM

Re: Let's keep our cool

Earl July 23, 2007 11:58AM

Re: Let's keep our cool

Dave Boyer July 23, 2007 12:10PM

Re: Let's keep our cool

BillD July 23, 2007 03:53PM

Re: Let's keep our cool

Anonymous User July 23, 2007 04:56PM

Re: Let's keep our cool

Rick Steele July 25, 2007 07:44AM

SLSF 4-8-2 #1522

Anonymous User July 25, 2007 07:57AM

Re: SLSF 4-8-2 #1522

John Craft July 25, 2007 08:11AM

Re: Let's keep our cool

Ed Ellis July 23, 2007 08:23PM

sounds familiar, tho

Mik July 23, 2007 08:18AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login