Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

December 08, 2006 11:20AM
Randall,
I've got to agree with Greg. Most people who take a train ride don't much care what it says on the engine or cars, but a few people do, and they are most likely the ones who are interested in history.
The C&TS needs to get as many people to ride as possible, and to do that they need to promote all aspects of the ride. Scenery and the historic nature of the railroad are probably the two major draws and to be historic, they should be trying to make the railroad as historically accurate as possible.
When I go to the Henry Ford museum, I'm not confused by the fact that the C&O 2-6-6-6 says C&O on it. I know I'm at the Henry Ford and I appreciate that the engine is displayed authentically, not lettered for CSX or Ford!
When people ride the Huckleberry Railroad, they know where they are but many of them appreciate the fact that the engine (D&RGW 464) has been restored as authentically as possible. Their other engine (4-6-0 #2), which has been lettered for the Huckleberry Railroad for many years, is now lettered USA and carrying #152, its original number and lettering under original owner the Alaska Engineering Commission, a US government agency. Plans are to leave it in this configuration until it undergoes its 1470 day overhaul. I'm hoping it comes back that way after the overhaul as well!
Michael Allen
Subject Author Posted

464 on the Huckleberry *PIC*

Galen R. Witham December 03, 2006 03:52PM

Re: 464 on the Huckleberry *PIC*

Galen R. Witham December 03, 2006 03:53PM

Re: 464 on the Huckleberry *PIC*

Galen R. Witham December 03, 2006 03:55PM

Re: 464 on the Huckleberry

thomas bones December 04, 2006 04:38PM

Re: 464 photos

Dave S. December 03, 2006 04:23PM

Re: 464 photos

PRSL December 03, 2006 05:01PM

464 Question

Hoss The Wideload December 03, 2006 06:02PM

Re: 464 Question

Dan Maday December 03, 2006 06:23PM

Re: 464

Tom Platten December 03, 2006 08:25PM

And another 464 question...

Ed Stabler December 03, 2006 08:26PM

Coupler sizes

Adam Wright December 03, 2006 09:01PM

Re: Coupler sizes

Brian Norden December 03, 2006 10:51PM

Re: Coupler sizes: 3/4 on 2' Maine lines

PRSL December 04, 2006 07:44AM

Re: 464 on the Huckleberry

Robert Herronen December 04, 2006 08:00AM

Re: 464 on the Huckleberry

SZuiderveen December 05, 2006 08:19AM

Re: 464 on the Huckleberry

Robert Herronen December 05, 2006 09:04AM

Re: 464 on the Huckleberry

Michael Allen December 06, 2006 09:11PM

464 and the flying Rio Grande

Ross December 07, 2006 09:06AM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande *LINK*

Greg Scholl December 07, 2006 11:40AM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Ross December 07, 2006 12:30PM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Greg Scholl December 07, 2006 12:53PM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Randall Hess December 07, 2006 02:16PM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Chile John December 07, 2006 02:21PM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Greg Scholl December 07, 2006 05:51PM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Randall Hess December 07, 2006 09:37PM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Greg Scholl December 08, 2006 06:39AM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Randall Hess December 08, 2006 10:55AM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Michael Allen December 08, 2006 11:20AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.