Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

December 08, 2006 06:39AM
You would be correct if your are talking about HARD-CORE VIDEO buyers, and HARD-CORE Train enthusiasts. However, the average joe could care less who made it, if they want the title, nor what lettering is on the tender of an engine as long as its taking them on their train ride.
Case in point, look at the multi-colored coaches on the 2006 C&TS trains. Still, with this hodge-podge they gained ridership from 2005....go figure!!!
My point with C&TS more than other railroads is that it should depict more historical aspects than some other railroads. Why? Because it was saved partially for that reason, and its state owned and operated. The D&S, and other lines are simply tourist railroads! That said the D&S has a pretty good track record recently of depicting its heritage...ie specials, Bumblebee 473, etc. When was the last time the C&TS did a railfan weekend, or some sort of heritage thing that the railroad sponsored? There have been privately sponsored things, but not company sponsored other than the Goose and Eureka which are not historical to the Cumbres route.
Again, the C&TS Cumbre Route is unique, like the Durango Line, Nevada Northern, and EBT, in that they have the exact locomotives that used to run on the same identical railroad today that they were built for. Not many places can claim that, so why not depict it on the engines? Anyone can be a tourist railroad, but few can be a throwback to their own heritage.
Greg
Subject Author Posted

464 on the Huckleberry *PIC*

Galen R. Witham December 03, 2006 03:52PM

Re: 464 on the Huckleberry *PIC*

Galen R. Witham December 03, 2006 03:53PM

Re: 464 on the Huckleberry *PIC*

Galen R. Witham December 03, 2006 03:55PM

Re: 464 on the Huckleberry

thomas bones December 04, 2006 04:38PM

Re: 464 photos

Dave S. December 03, 2006 04:23PM

Re: 464 photos

PRSL December 03, 2006 05:01PM

464 Question

Hoss The Wideload December 03, 2006 06:02PM

Re: 464 Question

Dan Maday December 03, 2006 06:23PM

Re: 464

Tom Platten December 03, 2006 08:25PM

And another 464 question...

Ed Stabler December 03, 2006 08:26PM

Coupler sizes

Adam Wright December 03, 2006 09:01PM

Re: Coupler sizes

Brian Norden December 03, 2006 10:51PM

Re: Coupler sizes: 3/4 on 2' Maine lines

PRSL December 04, 2006 07:44AM

Re: 464 on the Huckleberry

Robert Herronen December 04, 2006 08:00AM

Re: 464 on the Huckleberry

SZuiderveen December 05, 2006 08:19AM

Re: 464 on the Huckleberry

Robert Herronen December 05, 2006 09:04AM

Re: 464 on the Huckleberry

Michael Allen December 06, 2006 09:11PM

464 and the flying Rio Grande

Ross December 07, 2006 09:06AM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande *LINK*

Greg Scholl December 07, 2006 11:40AM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Ross December 07, 2006 12:30PM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Greg Scholl December 07, 2006 12:53PM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Randall Hess December 07, 2006 02:16PM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Chile John December 07, 2006 02:21PM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Greg Scholl December 07, 2006 05:51PM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Randall Hess December 07, 2006 09:37PM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Greg Scholl December 08, 2006 06:39AM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Randall Hess December 08, 2006 10:55AM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Michael Allen December 08, 2006 11:20AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.