Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

December 07, 2006 12:53PM
I have been suggesting for years that they letter the locomotives(Steam)Rio Grande in honor of the former railroad which they use EVERYDAY(D&RGW). I am sure the UP would have no problem with that, if someone from the railroad would just ask them!
I hate to even bring this up since I tend to beat a dead horse on this issue(Whenever I can). For some reason the other camp is in love with the C&TS name. Maybe its like the basement model train "It's own railroad, and I can name it the way I want to". The C&TS line is one of the most complete, and historic railroads in the U.S. It would sure be nice if they could make it look that way too. Kudos to the Huckleberry, who as Michael Allen stated earlier doesn't have to do it, cause its a local outfit and not historical in nature. Its just a train ride to enjoy, yet the shop folks choose to make the engine look as authentic as possible. Thats what I call true preservation. Its always baffled me why its such a big deal to paint D&RGW or Rio Grande on the C&TS engines, when other folks do it all the time, and they aren't even near where these engines once ran. The C&TS and D&S are unique animals in that these engines once worked in regular service on these exact routes they use today. It only makes sense to letter them for the home railroad. Heck Heber Valley Railroad couls letter their engines Heber Valley Railroad, yet their 2-8-0 is lettered for the predecessor railroad(Union Pacific).
I guess my Christmas wish would be that the C&TS commission decides to use proper historical markings on the equipment and buildings that are remaining from the 60's era. Note I did not say change the name of the railroad, just the engines, water tanks, and buildings. How cool would it be to see D&RGW heralds on the Water Tanks, and stations again!
Happy Holidays.
Greg
Subject Author Posted

464 on the Huckleberry *PIC*

Galen R. Witham December 03, 2006 03:52PM

Re: 464 on the Huckleberry *PIC*

Galen R. Witham December 03, 2006 03:53PM

Re: 464 on the Huckleberry *PIC*

Galen R. Witham December 03, 2006 03:55PM

Re: 464 on the Huckleberry

thomas bones December 04, 2006 04:38PM

Re: 464 photos

Dave S. December 03, 2006 04:23PM

Re: 464 photos

PRSL December 03, 2006 05:01PM

464 Question

Hoss The Wideload December 03, 2006 06:02PM

Re: 464 Question

Dan Maday December 03, 2006 06:23PM

Re: 464

Tom Platten December 03, 2006 08:25PM

And another 464 question...

Ed Stabler December 03, 2006 08:26PM

Coupler sizes

Adam Wright December 03, 2006 09:01PM

Re: Coupler sizes

Brian Norden December 03, 2006 10:51PM

Re: Coupler sizes: 3/4 on 2' Maine lines

PRSL December 04, 2006 07:44AM

Re: 464 on the Huckleberry

Robert Herronen December 04, 2006 08:00AM

Re: 464 on the Huckleberry

SZuiderveen December 05, 2006 08:19AM

Re: 464 on the Huckleberry

Robert Herronen December 05, 2006 09:04AM

Re: 464 on the Huckleberry

Michael Allen December 06, 2006 09:11PM

464 and the flying Rio Grande

Ross December 07, 2006 09:06AM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande *LINK*

Greg Scholl December 07, 2006 11:40AM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Ross December 07, 2006 12:30PM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Greg Scholl December 07, 2006 12:53PM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Randall Hess December 07, 2006 02:16PM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Chile John December 07, 2006 02:21PM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Greg Scholl December 07, 2006 05:51PM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Randall Hess December 07, 2006 09:37PM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Greg Scholl December 08, 2006 06:39AM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Randall Hess December 08, 2006 10:55AM

Re: 464 and the flying Rio Grande

Michael Allen December 08, 2006 11:20AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.