Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

BW photography and filters *LINK*

October 14, 2006 10:01AM
Yes, the type of film does make a difference, even with today's "panchromatic" BW films. Different tonal response, and slightly different color response all make BW film choice part of the artistic decision process in BW photography.
Additionally:
Another problem with colorizing is many b/w films were orthochromatic, they were not red sensitive, so reds come out darker in a print and blues/greens come out lighter.
Indeed, but to add to the mix, even with more modern panchromatic films, color filters were and are VERY commonly used by BW photographers. Often things which stand out nicely in color will not in a panchromatic BW view without the help of a color filter. Red, yellow, orange, green and blue filters of various strenghts are all commonly used. [And yes, these filters can be easily simulated in digital color to BW conversions.]
If interested, the link below is to an image I took some years back of Baker Tank on Boreas Pass, shot with an orange filter. In the real world, the well-lit tank stood out dramatically due to its deep reddish color, but if I hadn't used a filter, the tank would simply blend into the background, as it's tonal values are similar to its surroundings. And, of course, orange and red filters do make for dramatic skies!
It'd be pretty tough to determine the tank's color from this shot.
The bottom line is that unless you know or can extrapolate from some other historical source (written record, similar surviving structure or car, etc.) there's no reliable way to completely determine proper color from a BW image.
Scott
Subject Author Posted

Historical Ramifications of photo manipulation

johnny graybeal October 11, 2006 01:29PM

Re: Historical Ramifications of photo manipulation

Robert Herronen October 11, 2006 02:48PM

Re: Historical Ramifications of photo manipulation

Bill Calmes October 11, 2006 02:58PM

The BIGGER Ramifications to History

M Austin October 11, 2006 03:54PM

Re: The BIGGER Ramifications to History

Nathan Holmes October 11, 2006 05:49PM

Re: The BIGGER Ramifications to History

Ron Keagle October 11, 2006 07:56PM

Re: The BIGGER Ramifications to History

Jerry Day October 11, 2006 08:20PM

Re: The BIGGER Ramifications to History

Nathan Holmes October 11, 2006 08:30PM

Re: Very Important Point

John Craft October 12, 2006 06:21AM

Re: Very Important Point

Rick Renz October 12, 2006 07:44AM

Re: Very Important Point

Al Patterson October 12, 2006 05:23PM

Re: Very Important Point

Al Patterson October 12, 2006 05:22PM

Re: Historical Ramifications of photo manipulation

Andrew Brandon October 11, 2006 06:24PM

Re: Historical Ramifications of photo manipulation

Brian Norden October 11, 2006 08:05PM

Re: Historical Ramifications of photo manipulation

Lon Wall October 11, 2006 06:52PM

News Photography & Photoshop

Jerry Day October 11, 2006 08:37PM

Fascinating...

El Coke October 12, 2006 06:13PM

Re: Fascinating...

Brett Payne October 12, 2006 06:44PM

Re: Fascinating...

rick b October 13, 2006 12:20AM

Re: Fascinating...

Steve Stockham October 13, 2006 07:34AM

"Becky Sharp" and "rainsilver"

El Coke October 13, 2006 08:31AM

Re: "Becky Sharp" and "rainsilver"

Ed Stabler October 13, 2006 09:41AM

Re: "Becky Sharp" and "rainsilver"

rick b October 13, 2006 10:45AM

Reminds me of a John Prine song...

El Coke October 13, 2006 07:28PM

BW photography and filters *LINK*

Scott Turner October 14, 2006 10:01AM

Re: BW photography and filters

Richard "Bo" Boulware October 14, 2006 12:06PM

Re: BW photography and filters

Richard "Bo" Boulware October 14, 2006 12:36PM

Re: BW photography and filters

El Skonk October 16, 2006 05:13PM

Re: BW photography and filters

rick b October 17, 2006 12:01AM

Re: BW photography and filters

Greg Scholl October 17, 2006 08:26AM

Re: BW photography and filters

El Skonk October 17, 2006 09:35AM

Re: News Photography & Photoshop

rick b October 13, 2006 12:15AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.