Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

News Photography & Photoshop

October 11, 2006 08:37PM
Reuters News Agency is making rules for their photographers....
From Adobe PhotoShopNews.com
[photoshopnews.com]
Posted By PSN Editorial Staff
Source: blogs.Reuters.com
Written by Gary Hershorn, News Pictures Editor for North America
News photographers routinely process images using Adobe Photoshop software. But there has been a basic premise in the world of photojournalism that what was allowed in making prints in the pre-digital days of darkrooms is all that is acceptable today.
Back in the days of the darkroom, we used very basic tools to develop prints. In black and white printing, the contrast of a picture was controlled by a paper’s grade. The higher the number of the paper, the higher the contrast. In the wire agency darkooms I’ve worked in, we typically used grades 3,4 and 5. We allowed “dodge and burn” to lighten or darken areas. A dodge tool was made by taping a small piece of cardboard the size of a quarter onto a paper clip. A burn tool was a piece of cardboard the size of an 8×10 sheet of paper with a hole in the center. If a print had dust spots caused by a dirty negative, we used Spotone, a photographic paint that was dabbed onto a print with a very fine paint brush to eliminate the unsightly marks.
One other tool that was allowed when printing color pictures was changing color balance. This was done by placing filters between the light source of the enlarger and the paper that the image was being printed on.
When we moved to scanning negatives and then to shooting digital, we began using Photoshop. This program allows us to do the same things we did in the darkroom. Changes in contrast, dodging and burning and color balance are now done with software. The most controversial tool in Photoshop that we use is the cloning tool. The only accepted use of this tool is to clear dust from the image. We have a zero tolerance policy when it comes to using the cloning tool to change content, and by that we mean removing something that exists in a photo, moving or replicating it or adding to a photo.
The tools we use in Photoshop are levels, curves and saturation for changing contrasts; and, color balance to bring the image back to the way the natural eye would see the color. Here is what we tell our photographers in the Handbook of Reuters Journalism.
Photoshop is a highly sophisticated image manipulation programme. We use only a tiny part of its potential capability to format our pictures, crop and size them and balance the tone and colour. For us it is a presentational tool.
The rules are – no additions or deletions, no misleading the viewer by manipulation of the tonal and colour balance to disguise elements of an image or to change the context.
Photoshop is a powerful image processing program with many more tools to help photographers produce the best quality image they can for the type of photography they do. There is not a Photoshop program for use by news photographers and another for advertising, where image-changing is tolerated. What we in the news photo community need to regulate is what tools are used for photojournalism and what are not.
Subject Author Posted

Historical Ramifications of photo manipulation

johnny graybeal October 11, 2006 01:29PM

Re: Historical Ramifications of photo manipulation

Robert Herronen October 11, 2006 02:48PM

Re: Historical Ramifications of photo manipulation

Bill Calmes October 11, 2006 02:58PM

The BIGGER Ramifications to History

M Austin October 11, 2006 03:54PM

Re: The BIGGER Ramifications to History

Nathan Holmes October 11, 2006 05:49PM

Re: The BIGGER Ramifications to History

Ron Keagle October 11, 2006 07:56PM

Re: The BIGGER Ramifications to History

Jerry Day October 11, 2006 08:20PM

Re: The BIGGER Ramifications to History

Nathan Holmes October 11, 2006 08:30PM

Re: Very Important Point

John Craft October 12, 2006 06:21AM

Re: Very Important Point

Rick Renz October 12, 2006 07:44AM

Re: Very Important Point

Al Patterson October 12, 2006 05:23PM

Re: Very Important Point

Al Patterson October 12, 2006 05:22PM

Re: Historical Ramifications of photo manipulation

Andrew Brandon October 11, 2006 06:24PM

Re: Historical Ramifications of photo manipulation

Brian Norden October 11, 2006 08:05PM

Re: Historical Ramifications of photo manipulation

Lon Wall October 11, 2006 06:52PM

News Photography & Photoshop

Jerry Day October 11, 2006 08:37PM

Fascinating...

El Coke October 12, 2006 06:13PM

Re: Fascinating...

Brett Payne October 12, 2006 06:44PM

Re: Fascinating...

rick b October 13, 2006 12:20AM

Re: Fascinating...

Steve Stockham October 13, 2006 07:34AM

"Becky Sharp" and "rainsilver"

El Coke October 13, 2006 08:31AM

Re: "Becky Sharp" and "rainsilver"

Ed Stabler October 13, 2006 09:41AM

Re: "Becky Sharp" and "rainsilver"

rick b October 13, 2006 10:45AM

Reminds me of a John Prine song...

El Coke October 13, 2006 07:28PM

BW photography and filters *LINK*

Scott Turner October 14, 2006 10:01AM

Re: BW photography and filters

Richard "Bo" Boulware October 14, 2006 12:06PM

Re: BW photography and filters

Richard "Bo" Boulware October 14, 2006 12:36PM

Re: BW photography and filters

El Skonk October 16, 2006 05:13PM

Re: BW photography and filters

rick b October 17, 2006 12:01AM

Re: BW photography and filters

Greg Scholl October 17, 2006 08:26AM

Re: BW photography and filters

El Skonk October 17, 2006 09:35AM

Re: News Photography & Photoshop

rick b October 13, 2006 12:15AM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.