Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Oil or Coal

El Nihi
July 25, 2005 09:54AM
A number of years ago, the EPA showed up at the Loop, prompted by complaints by locals regarding all the nasty smoke that was created by the train.
The train passed with no difficulty, and the EPA was also pleased with the fact that they were burning waste oil. Additionally, the railroad has facilities for loading oil, and none for loading coal.
If coal is chosen, will they get rid of the oil burner they are currently using? What about the diesel?
So for ease of operation, oil would be the choice. For historic preservation, coal.
So the precident has already been set. Question is, will they attempt to set a new precident, in the name of historic preservation, or will they try to make money running a railroad?
Subject Author Posted

30 & 9

Matthew July 22, 2005 11:39AM

Re: 30 & 9

Don Richter July 22, 2005 12:52PM

Re: 30 & 9

South Park July 22, 2005 01:27PM

Re: 30 & 9

Chris Webster July 22, 2005 02:20PM

Re: 30 & 9

South Park July 22, 2005 02:29PM

Re: 30 & 9

Steve Singer July 22, 2005 04:27PM

Re: 30 & 9

Kelly Anderson July 22, 2005 07:54PM

Re: 30 & 9

Bruce R. Pier July 23, 2005 09:58AM

Thanks

Matthew July 22, 2005 04:59PM

Re: Thanks

Hans-Jochen Trost July 24, 2005 10:40PM

Re: Thanks

Joe P July 26, 2005 10:18PM

Re: Thanks

Hans-Jochen Trost July 27, 2005 10:26PM

Oil or Coal

El Nihi July 25, 2005 09:54AM

Re: Oil or Coal

Shane Schabow July 26, 2005 07:59PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.