Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: C&S #9 Boiler - why not a RePliKa??

July 08, 2005 03:57PM
My 2 cents: Continue with the rebuilds of #9 & #30/74. Keep the restorations as historically accurate as possible as they appeared in service on the C&S. Run them only sparingly, I.E. special
events. Construct 2 or 3 replica 2-8-0 engines of a standard design patterned after the C&S consols or even maybe a D&RG C19. and run the crap out of them. Therefore, the historical integity of both #9 and #30/74 are not compromised and the Loop will posess reliable motive power for decades. Problem solved.
Subject Author Posted

Railstar promises 80% to 90% of 2005 Capacity *LINK*

Chris Webster June 29, 2005 05:37PM

and No. 9 to "be ready in two or three weeks" *NM* *NM*

Chris Webster June 29, 2005 05:41PM

Can't open the link *NM*

John West June 29, 2005 06:15PM

The article *LINK*

Fred T June 29, 2005 06:31PM

Re: The article

Ron Ruhoff June 29, 2005 06:46PM

Re: The article/ economics?

Mike Stillwell June 30, 2005 06:58AM

re: Outsider's Perspective - Don't Tar RailStar(?)

Russ Sperry July 01, 2005 03:36PM

Re: re: Outsider's Perspective - Don't Tar RailSta

Jim MacMillan July 01, 2005 05:13PM

Re: re: Outsider's Perspective - Don't Tar RailSta

Russo de los Locos July 02, 2005 01:36AM

Corrected Link *LINK*

Chris Webster June 29, 2005 06:31PM

Re: and No. 9 to "be ready in two or three weeks"

Towne Comee June 30, 2005 08:04AM

C&S 9 *PIC*

Matthew June 30, 2005 04:56PM

Re: C&S 9

Mike Trent June 30, 2005 08:13PM

Re: C&S 9

tom casper June 30, 2005 08:53PM

Re: C&S 9

Towne Comee July 01, 2005 08:02AM

Re: C&S 9 *PIC*

Dave Bates July 01, 2005 01:55PM

Re: C&S 9

Chris Webster July 01, 2005 03:25PM

Yes

Dave Bates July 01, 2005 03:34PM

Re: C&S 9 *LINK*

Linn W. Moedinger July 01, 2005 03:45PM

Wive's Tale #12 regarding #74 *LINK*

Mike Trent July 01, 2005 09:34PM

What we heard

El Coke July 03, 2005 08:04PM

Re: What we heard

Mike Trent July 04, 2005 07:22PM

Re: C&S 9

Ted Krumreich July 04, 2005 07:46PM

Re: C&S 9

Jason Midyette July 05, 2005 07:10AM

Re: C&S 9 *LINK*

Linn W. Moedinger July 06, 2005 05:08AM

Re: C&S 9

Rick Steele July 06, 2005 09:03AM

Re: C&S 9

Shane Schabow July 01, 2005 05:08PM

Re: C&S 9 *LINK*

Mark Fuller July 06, 2005 09:54AM

Re: C&S 9

Douglas vV July 07, 2005 02:41PM

Here is the 74/30 too *PIC*

Matthew June 30, 2005 09:51PM

A rumour about C&S 9s Boiler

Thor Windbergs July 06, 2005 02:47PM

Re: A rumour about C&S 9s Boiler

Steve Stockham July 06, 2005 04:02PM

Re: A rumour about C&S 9s Boiler

KWilcomb July 06, 2005 04:49PM

Re: A rumour about C&S 9s Boiler

Mike Trent July 06, 2005 07:20PM

Re: A rumour about C&S 9s Boiler

Karell Reader July 06, 2005 07:47PM

Re: A rumour about C&S 9s Boiler

Howard July 07, 2005 12:16AM

Re: C&S #9 Boiler - why not a RePliKa??

Russ Sperry July 07, 2005 02:06PM

Re: C&S #9 Boiler - why not a RePliKa??

Festus July 07, 2005 02:31PM

Re: C&S #9 Boiler - why not a RePliKa??

Jason Midyette July 07, 2005 05:47PM

Re: Why not RePliKas - 2 2-6-0's & 2 2-8-0's?? *LINK*

Russ Sperry July 07, 2005 06:43PM

Re: Why not RePliKas - 2 2-6-0's & 2 2-8-0's?? *LINK* *PIC*

Kelly Anderson July 08, 2005 06:07AM

Re: C&S #9 Boiler - why not a RePliKa??

John Kyler July 07, 2005 08:16PM

Re: C&S #9 - why not a RePliKa??

Curtis_F July 07, 2005 11:16PM

Re: C&S #9 Boiler - why not a RePliKa??

Ken Martin July 08, 2005 12:29PM

Re: C&S #9 Boiler - why not a RePliKa??

Steve Stockham July 08, 2005 06:40AM

Re: C&S #9 Boiler - why not #70

Kevin July 08, 2005 01:43PM

Re: C&S #9 Boiler - why not a RePliKa??

Donald Foster July 08, 2005 03:57PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.