Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: C&S 9

July 01, 2005 05:08PM
UHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.............great shot of #9.....I think..............wow............
I don't know about Mr. Gores's statement of #9 being the "little savior", as she is going to need a savior of her own to be ready in 30 THIRTY 30 THIRTY DAYS AS CHS PROMISED!
Nothing against Peter Gores or Railstar in the slightest. I have the utmost respect for them and all that they are doing to keep the loop running in 2005 and beyond. However, if CHS is telling them promises of how #9 will be ready to run by the end of THIS MONTH, THIS YEAR, I think that CHS has fooled them.
Then again, perhaps I will be proven very incorrect when #9 steams out of the Silver Plume Shop, gleaming in brand-new, shiny black paint and white lettering; ready to run "Over the Loop" once again......................
But then again, maybe I'm right.........time will tell, right?!
If I'm not mistaken, (anyone PLEASE correct me if I am wrong!) CHS stated that "#9 will be on site (meaning on the property in the Silver Plume Yards) by July." This could therefore only mean that the engine, whether in parts or assembled, running or not, will be on the property by the end of this month. IT DOES NOT EXPLICTLY STATE "OPERATING BY JULY OF 2005".
Of course, their first statement, and one which they adamantly stood by was that it would be ready by July 1, 2005. I have now heard "in two or three weeks", which puts the engine's Loop debut at nearly the END OF THE MONTH.
What is next is the continuing saga of abused and neglected #9 ?!
(at the "caring" hands of CHS)
and yes I did just bash CHS, NOT RAILSTAR-MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT THAT - in my book
CHS=questionable politically driven organization
Railstar=very determined, well-intentioned, friendly, decent operator who is doing one hell of a job at keeping an historic railroad running day in and day out)
We shall see.....stay tuned everyone
And please be courteous to those from Railstar, they are a good group of people trying to do what they can with what they have. And NO ONE should give them @#$%& about it!!!
Respectfully,
Shane
Subject Author Posted

Railstar promises 80% to 90% of 2005 Capacity *LINK*

Chris Webster June 29, 2005 05:37PM

and No. 9 to "be ready in two or three weeks" *NM* *NM*

Chris Webster June 29, 2005 05:41PM

Can't open the link *NM*

John West June 29, 2005 06:15PM

The article *LINK*

Fred T June 29, 2005 06:31PM

Re: The article

Ron Ruhoff June 29, 2005 06:46PM

Re: The article/ economics?

Mike Stillwell June 30, 2005 06:58AM

re: Outsider's Perspective - Don't Tar RailStar(?)

Russ Sperry July 01, 2005 03:36PM

Re: re: Outsider's Perspective - Don't Tar RailSta

Jim MacMillan July 01, 2005 05:13PM

Re: re: Outsider's Perspective - Don't Tar RailSta

Russo de los Locos July 02, 2005 01:36AM

Corrected Link *LINK*

Chris Webster June 29, 2005 06:31PM

Re: and No. 9 to "be ready in two or three weeks"

Towne Comee June 30, 2005 08:04AM

C&S 9 *PIC*

Matthew June 30, 2005 04:56PM

Re: C&S 9

Mike Trent June 30, 2005 08:13PM

Re: C&S 9

tom casper June 30, 2005 08:53PM

Re: C&S 9

Towne Comee July 01, 2005 08:02AM

Re: C&S 9 *PIC*

Dave Bates July 01, 2005 01:55PM

Re: C&S 9

Chris Webster July 01, 2005 03:25PM

Yes

Dave Bates July 01, 2005 03:34PM

Re: C&S 9 *LINK*

Linn W. Moedinger July 01, 2005 03:45PM

Wive's Tale #12 regarding #74 *LINK*

Mike Trent July 01, 2005 09:34PM

What we heard

El Coke July 03, 2005 08:04PM

Re: What we heard

Mike Trent July 04, 2005 07:22PM

Re: C&S 9

Ted Krumreich July 04, 2005 07:46PM

Re: C&S 9

Jason Midyette July 05, 2005 07:10AM

Re: C&S 9 *LINK*

Linn W. Moedinger July 06, 2005 05:08AM

Re: C&S 9

Rick Steele July 06, 2005 09:03AM

Re: C&S 9

Shane Schabow July 01, 2005 05:08PM

Re: C&S 9 *LINK*

Mark Fuller July 06, 2005 09:54AM

Re: C&S 9

Douglas vV July 07, 2005 02:41PM

Here is the 74/30 too *PIC*

Matthew June 30, 2005 09:51PM

A rumour about C&S 9s Boiler

Thor Windbergs July 06, 2005 02:47PM

Re: A rumour about C&S 9s Boiler

Steve Stockham July 06, 2005 04:02PM

Re: A rumour about C&S 9s Boiler

KWilcomb July 06, 2005 04:49PM

Re: A rumour about C&S 9s Boiler

Mike Trent July 06, 2005 07:20PM

Re: A rumour about C&S 9s Boiler

Karell Reader July 06, 2005 07:47PM

Re: A rumour about C&S 9s Boiler

Howard July 07, 2005 12:16AM

Re: C&S #9 Boiler - why not a RePliKa??

Russ Sperry July 07, 2005 02:06PM

Re: C&S #9 Boiler - why not a RePliKa??

Festus July 07, 2005 02:31PM

Re: C&S #9 Boiler - why not a RePliKa??

Jason Midyette July 07, 2005 05:47PM

Re: Why not RePliKas - 2 2-6-0's & 2 2-8-0's?? *LINK*

Russ Sperry July 07, 2005 06:43PM

Re: Why not RePliKas - 2 2-6-0's & 2 2-8-0's?? *LINK* *PIC*

Kelly Anderson July 08, 2005 06:07AM

Re: C&S #9 Boiler - why not a RePliKa??

John Kyler July 07, 2005 08:16PM

Re: C&S #9 - why not a RePliKa??

Curtis_F July 07, 2005 11:16PM

Re: C&S #9 Boiler - why not a RePliKa??

Ken Martin July 08, 2005 12:29PM

Re: C&S #9 Boiler - why not a RePliKa??

Steve Stockham July 08, 2005 06:40AM

Re: C&S #9 Boiler - why not #70

Kevin July 08, 2005 01:43PM

Re: C&S #9 Boiler - why not a RePliKa??

Donald Foster July 08, 2005 03:57PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.