Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Rotary OM

February 21, 2005 08:09AM
Last I heard the frame was the main problem, it was / is pretty severely rotted out.
However mechanically,as I understand it, it's in reasonably good shape. One thing about these things it that they weren't used all that much so they don't have a heck of a lot of miles on them. Also they aren't convenient sources of parts so they're pretty much intact.
As for getting either OM or OY running, as Les indicates, the C&TS has other priorities and I would think that neither rotary will get much attention until there are at least 4 engines running and the track is in good enough shape to make even the most picky FRA inspector grin.
Don
Subject Author Posted

Rotary OM

Paul Strubeck February 20, 2005 06:20PM

Re: Rotary OM

Les Clark February 20, 2005 06:23PM

Re: Rotary OM

Don Richter February 21, 2005 08:09AM

Re: Rotary OM *LINK*

Greg Scholl February 21, 2005 11:33AM

Re: Rotary OM

Smitty February 21, 2005 01:40PM

Re: Rotary OM reg: FRA

PRSL February 21, 2005 01:58PM

Re: Rotary OM reg: FRA

John Cole February 21, 2005 02:30PM

Re: Rotary OM reg: FRA

PRSL February 21, 2005 04:06PM

Re: Rotary OM reg: FRA

Don Richter February 21, 2005 06:47PM

Re: Rotary OM

John Cole February 21, 2005 02:35PM

Re: Rotary OM

Les Clark February 21, 2005 05:06PM

Re: Rotary OM

Tom Farmer February 21, 2005 05:17PM

Re: Rotary OM

PRSL February 21, 2005 06:29PM

Re: Rotary OM

chris ahrens February 21, 2005 09:13PM

Re: Rotary OM

earl February 21, 2005 11:09PM

Re: Rotary OM

Paul Strubeck February 21, 2005 11:41PM

Re: Rotary OM

Paul Strubeck February 21, 2005 11:43PM

Re: Rotary OM

earl February 22, 2005 03:03PM

Re: Rotary OM

John Cole February 22, 2005 04:27PM

Re: Rotary OM

rick b February 22, 2005 07:39PM

Re: Rotary OM

Les Clark February 23, 2005 05:07PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.