Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: C&S #346 to the Loop rescue?

January 10, 2005 08:16AM
That brings up an interesting question. If the 346 were to be loaned to the new GTLRR, would they convert it to an oil burner? Not to rehash the coal v. oil issue, but in this case, it seems the conversion would be ill advised since the engine is not owned by the CHS or Railstar.
Don
Subject Author Posted

C&S #346 to the Loop rescue? *LINK*

Rod Jensen January 09, 2005 11:45PM

C&S #346 + other $$$

Ken in Buena Vista January 10, 2005 06:29AM

Re: C&S #346 to the Loop rescue?

Paul Hagglund January 10, 2005 08:05AM

Re: C&S #346 to the Loop rescue?

Don Richter January 10, 2005 08:16AM

Superheaters vs. Saturated

Stephen Peck January 10, 2005 08:19AM

Re: Superheaters vs. Saturated

Paul Gibbs January 10, 2005 08:55AM

Re: Superheaters vs. Saturated

Stephen Peck January 10, 2005 09:26AM

Re: Superheaters vs. Saturated

KWilcomb January 10, 2005 09:54AM

Re: Superheaters vs. Saturated

Trevor Hartford January 10, 2005 04:58PM

Re: Superheaters vs. Saturated

KWilcomb January 10, 2005 05:07PM

Re: Superheaters vs. Saturated

Trevor Hartford January 11, 2005 02:19PM

Re: C&S #346 to the Loop rescue?

Jerry Day January 10, 2005 01:21PM

Re: C&S #346 to the Loop rescue? *LINK*

Rod Jensen January 10, 2005 02:13PM

... Loop rescue? *LINK*

Dave S. January 10, 2005 04:47PM

Re: ... Loop rescue?

Rod Jensen January 10, 2005 08:41PM

Re: ... Loop rescue?

John January 11, 2005 07:56AM

(Message Deleted by Poster)

Alan January 10, 2005 04:36PM

346, Fuel, and Possibilities

Ed Kelley January 10, 2005 09:51PM

Re: 346, Fuel, and Possibilities

Paul Luning January 10, 2005 10:54PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.