Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

If GLR Was Rewarded Contract...

Ed Kelley
September 25, 2004 08:58PM
Just like the courage it took to display the anti-GLR opinion...it also takes the courage to say "no" and walk away...
Again another rant based on my opinion and what I've seen; again...I'm just an outsider...
Picture being on an airplane while 10-year-olds kick the back of the seat; you have a 500-pound man next to you asleep with his arm taking up your entire tiny coach armrest...while snores and reeks as if you fueled a steam locomotive on roadkill...as he knocks over your Ginger Ale on your Armani suit...and this whole time you remain silent.
If the GLR just said "Okay...we'll take the RFP to be altruistic and keep the railroad alive)...they'd be holding in their silence. Implosive anger folks! Staying silent and not expressing what you want ends up in an explosive outrage!
While this is a general statement...CHS is the 500 pound man with body odor. This is just another way to look at it than my previous "rough water; breach of trust" analogy. If the GLR Inc. if they bid and were rewarded the RFP, they would have been the guy in the Armani suit in the cramped two-seater row with the 500-pound man with body odor (I bet that even if they DID bid that the CHS probably wouldn't have rewarded the contract to them because it is my understanding that the whole RFP bidding process was to get rid of the GLR Inc. after 30 sound years of operation over a personal stupid issue...). Sometimes you just have to let them know you aren't going to put up with their bulls***.
By walking away and not fighting the long battle any further, though it is a great loss to all, it was to the advantage of the company since apparently someone can't get Lee Behrens booted out of his office, or something else. Governor Owens didn't do jack squat either...which further supports the conspiracy theory as to why the local and state government was being completely ignorant and going along with the situation. Though this could result in a great loss for the area...blame it on CHS. The GLR Inc. and its loyal employees are a business and need to turn a profit. After all; less than 50 percent profits?! CHS owns the land; look who is the one maintaining the facilities and equipment! GLR Inc. has the mouths to feed of their employees and though we haven't heard anything from the source really I'm sure they found it to be the best decision.
As for why Lee Behrens wasn't booted...that question is up there along with the others such as "is there life after death" and "how can steam-hating diesel lovers exist?" (sorry...had to throw that in!) As said before, bringing personal feelings into the workplace is extremely unprofessional; the tombstone image doesn't say "Snuffed by that #$(@$* (replace that with any insult) Lee Behrens at the Colorado Historical Society".
-Ed Kelley
Subject Author Posted

Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Chris Weaver September 25, 2004 11:54AM

The secret to playing Chicken

Don Richter September 25, 2004 12:11PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Dave S. September 25, 2004 12:12PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Makes sense September 25, 2004 12:43PM

Weaver, *not* Webster!

Chris Webster September 25, 2004 02:50PM

Re: Weaver, nor Webster!

Dave S. September 25, 2004 03:29PM

Re: Weaver, nor Webster!

Chris Webster September 25, 2004 03:52PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.(corrected)

Gavin Hamilton September 25, 2004 02:58PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Skip Luke September 27, 2004 12:54PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Chris Weaver September 25, 2004 05:28PM

Chris - Well Stated - thanks

WP&Ymike September 25, 2004 12:36PM

It's people not process

John West September 25, 2004 01:05PM

Re: It's people not process

WP&Ymike September 25, 2004 03:22PM

Re: It's people not process

Kerry Ann September 25, 2004 04:29PM

Re: It's people not process

Chris Weaver September 25, 2004 05:43PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Jason Midyette September 25, 2004 01:11PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Skip Luke September 27, 2004 01:00PM

Excellant posting...

Dave Bates September 25, 2004 01:11PM

Re:

Ed Kelley September 25, 2004 01:48PM

Mr. Weaver Thank You

roger hogan September 25, 2004 01:43PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Kerry Ann September 25, 2004 04:00PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Jason Midyette September 25, 2004 04:50PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Kerry Ann September 25, 2004 05:52PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Jason Midyette September 25, 2004 08:05PM

I second the last paragraph !!! *NM*

Rodger Polley September 26, 2004 12:10AM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

chile john September 30, 2004 10:55AM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Skip Luke September 27, 2004 01:05PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Jeff Ramsey September 27, 2004 08:26PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Rick Steele September 28, 2004 07:31AM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Skip Luke September 28, 2004 12:21PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Steve Stockham September 25, 2004 06:17PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Chris Weaver September 25, 2004 06:27PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Tim Schreiner September 25, 2004 08:18PM

If GLR Was Rewarded Contract...

Ed Kelley September 25, 2004 08:58PM

GLR screwed up when.......

in the know September 25, 2004 09:25PM

(Message Deleted by Poster)

Jim Poston September 25, 2004 10:10PM

Re: "In the NO", You Screwed Up When...

in the know September 25, 2004 10:23PM

Re: "In the NO", You Screwed Up When...

Karell Reader September 26, 2004 07:47AM

Greska Screwed Up When...

Don Richter September 26, 2004 09:06AM

Re: Greska Screwed Up When...

Karell Reader September 26, 2004 11:21AM

Re: Greska Screwed Up When...

Don Richter September 26, 2004 01:22PM

You Can't Win Every Hand Playing Poker *PIC*

roger hogan September 26, 2004 02:40PM

Argentine Central

narrow minded September 30, 2004 04:11AM

Re: Argentine Central

Stephen Peck October 01, 2004 08:21AM

Revisionist History Already!!

Steve Stockham September 26, 2004 09:18AM

Re: Revisionist History Already!!

WP&Ymike September 26, 2004 03:06PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Wooly September 26, 2004 08:02AM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Kerry Ann September 26, 2004 10:40AM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Mark Greksa September 26, 2004 03:31PM

Thank you

Don Richter September 26, 2004 04:01PM

yes, thank you

WP&Ymike September 26, 2004 04:16PM

Thank you Mr.Greksa

roger hogan September 26, 2004 04:37PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Wooly September 26, 2004 05:26PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

dan denham September 26, 2004 05:56PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Chris Weaver September 26, 2004 07:23PM

Thank you

Philip Walters September 26, 2004 09:07PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Stephen September 29, 2004 01:43AM

Sure - I could also join Al-Qaeda

Skip Luke September 28, 2004 12:12PM

Re: Sure - I could also join...

Mike Stillwell September 28, 2004 12:35PM

Re: Sure - I could also join...

Skip Luke September 28, 2004 07:33PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.