September 25, 2004 01:05PM
|
|
|
From a purely procedural standpoint you are right on. But missing is the apparent influence of Mr. Behrens within the CHS. Why try to negotiate with someone who for whatever reason seems to hate your guts.
My guess is GLRInc choose not to respond because it was clear that as long as Mr. Behrens was influencing how the CHS delt with GLRInc the relationship between landlord and tenant was not going to be constructive. As a lawyer once told me, if the two parties aren't in fundamental agreement, don't try to bridge the gap with a few words on a piece of paper. If the people involved don't get along, problems are almost inevitable, and that increases business risk considerably. GLRInc choose not to take that risk.
If CHS were properly managed, they would have found somebody more objective to deal with CLRInc. and reduced Behrens' influence in the process. I would guess that if that had happened that GLRInc would have responded to the RFP.
Subject |
Author |
Posted |
|
Chris Weaver |
September 25, 2004 11:54AM |
|
Don Richter |
September 25, 2004 12:11PM |
|
Dave S. |
September 25, 2004 12:12PM |
|
Makes sense |
September 25, 2004 12:43PM |
|
Chris Webster |
September 25, 2004 02:50PM |
|
Dave S. |
September 25, 2004 03:29PM |
|
Chris Webster |
September 25, 2004 03:52PM |
|
Gavin Hamilton |
September 25, 2004 02:58PM |
|
Skip Luke |
September 27, 2004 12:54PM |
|
Chris Weaver |
September 25, 2004 05:28PM |
|
WP&Ymike |
September 25, 2004 12:36PM |
|
John West |
September 25, 2004 01:05PM |
|
WP&Ymike |
September 25, 2004 03:22PM |
|
Kerry Ann |
September 25, 2004 04:29PM |
|
Chris Weaver |
September 25, 2004 05:43PM |
|
Jason Midyette |
September 25, 2004 01:11PM |
|
Skip Luke |
September 27, 2004 01:00PM |
|
Dave Bates |
September 25, 2004 01:11PM |
|
Ed Kelley |
September 25, 2004 01:48PM |
|
roger hogan |
September 25, 2004 01:43PM |
|
Kerry Ann |
September 25, 2004 04:00PM |
|
Jason Midyette |
September 25, 2004 04:50PM |
|
Kerry Ann |
September 25, 2004 05:52PM |
|
Jason Midyette |
September 25, 2004 08:05PM |
|
Rodger Polley |
September 26, 2004 12:10AM |
|
chile john |
September 30, 2004 10:55AM |
|
Skip Luke |
September 27, 2004 01:05PM |
|
Jeff Ramsey |
September 27, 2004 08:26PM |
|
Rick Steele |
September 28, 2004 07:31AM |
|
Skip Luke |
September 28, 2004 12:21PM |
|
Steve Stockham |
September 25, 2004 06:17PM |
|
Chris Weaver |
September 25, 2004 06:27PM |
|
Tim Schreiner |
September 25, 2004 08:18PM |
|
Ed Kelley |
September 25, 2004 08:58PM |
|
in the know |
September 25, 2004 09:25PM |
|
Jim Poston |
September 25, 2004 10:10PM |
|
in the know |
September 25, 2004 10:23PM |
|
Karell Reader |
September 26, 2004 07:47AM |
|
Don Richter |
September 26, 2004 09:06AM |
|
Karell Reader |
September 26, 2004 11:21AM |
|
Don Richter |
September 26, 2004 01:22PM |
|
roger hogan |
September 26, 2004 02:40PM |
|
narrow minded |
September 30, 2004 04:11AM |
|
Stephen Peck |
October 01, 2004 08:21AM |
|
Steve Stockham |
September 26, 2004 09:18AM |
|
WP&Ymike |
September 26, 2004 03:06PM |
|
Wooly |
September 26, 2004 08:02AM |
|
Kerry Ann |
September 26, 2004 10:40AM |
|
Mark Greksa |
September 26, 2004 03:31PM |
|
Don Richter |
September 26, 2004 04:01PM |
|
WP&Ymike |
September 26, 2004 04:16PM |
|
roger hogan |
September 26, 2004 04:37PM |
|
Wooly |
September 26, 2004 05:26PM |
|
dan denham |
September 26, 2004 05:56PM |
|
Chris Weaver |
September 26, 2004 07:23PM |
|
Philip Walters |
September 26, 2004 09:07PM |
|
Stephen |
September 29, 2004 01:43AM |
|
Skip Luke |
September 28, 2004 12:12PM |
|
Mike Stillwell |
September 28, 2004 12:35PM |
|
Skip Luke |
September 28, 2004 07:33PM |
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.