Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Kerry Ann
September 25, 2004 05:52PM
Hi Jason. Figured I'd get that sort of response. Anyone who works actively against a business they work for should be considered for termination. That's just my opinion. If you didn't do that, then I apologize. It certainly did have that appearance though - and maybe they don't want to say it to your face, but I was not alone in this thought. Hopefully they will read your explanation and gain a better understanding, as I did.
As for:
"All of the energy you put into insuring that Railstar does not succeed only screws Railstar(an innocent participant in this fiasco from my perspective, as a radical thought, take the time to meet Mr. Trottier and talk with him for a while before you set your opinion of Railstar in stone) and the hardworking business owners of Georgetown and Silver Plume. What did they do to deserve your anger?"
I have never done anything to ensure that Railstar doesn't succeed. I have talked with Mr. Trottier and have posted on this board the elements of our conversation. I do not dislike him. I have no reason to. I did however learn from talking with him that he intended to run deisels for the first couple of years. Considering that the Loop was told NO! when they asked to run more deisels, I did find it to be unfair -not to mention the intent of this RFP was to run a steam operation.
As for the merchants and businesses here in this town -the brunt of my questioning of the whole situation is the result of concern for them (and MY tax base). Maybe you can afford to believe what the CHS is spouting, but the businesses here deserve more than this uncertainty. The CHS is moving forward with this absolute uncertainty despite the welfare of our businesses being in serious jeopardy and having an alternative to the uncertainty (heaven forbid they renegotiate with the Loop!). The CHS themselves have stated that it will take 30 years to regain what is here now.
It is absolutely atrocious that you would say that I am trying to destroy the Loop -In what way?
You stated, "Both in my opinion acted poorly in this situation." How did the Loop act poorly?
When I asked Behrens to substantiate his comments about the Loop, I was asking to see if maybe he could, maybe there was a reason that he should share. But if he couldn't (and he didn't) what's to say this man doesn't treat Railstar just as poorly?
Also, I have just been backchanneled re:RGRPC and their RFP. I will check further, but this person tells me that they DID NOT respond to the RFP, the CHS went with another operator, and six months later the CHS went BACK to the RGRPA to renegotiate. Again, I will try to verify this asap.
Jason, you are very knowledgable and I think it is clear that we both care about what happens here. Let's not be catty.
Subject Author Posted

Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Chris Weaver September 25, 2004 11:54AM

The secret to playing Chicken

Don Richter September 25, 2004 12:11PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Dave S. September 25, 2004 12:12PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Makes sense September 25, 2004 12:43PM

Weaver, *not* Webster!

Chris Webster September 25, 2004 02:50PM

Re: Weaver, nor Webster!

Dave S. September 25, 2004 03:29PM

Re: Weaver, nor Webster!

Chris Webster September 25, 2004 03:52PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.(corrected)

Gavin Hamilton September 25, 2004 02:58PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Skip Luke September 27, 2004 12:54PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Chris Weaver September 25, 2004 05:28PM

Chris - Well Stated - thanks

WP&Ymike September 25, 2004 12:36PM

It's people not process

John West September 25, 2004 01:05PM

Re: It's people not process

WP&Ymike September 25, 2004 03:22PM

Re: It's people not process

Kerry Ann September 25, 2004 04:29PM

Re: It's people not process

Chris Weaver September 25, 2004 05:43PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Jason Midyette September 25, 2004 01:11PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Skip Luke September 27, 2004 01:00PM

Excellant posting...

Dave Bates September 25, 2004 01:11PM

Re:

Ed Kelley September 25, 2004 01:48PM

Mr. Weaver Thank You

roger hogan September 25, 2004 01:43PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Kerry Ann September 25, 2004 04:00PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Jason Midyette September 25, 2004 04:50PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Kerry Ann September 25, 2004 05:52PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Jason Midyette September 25, 2004 08:05PM

I second the last paragraph !!! *NM*

Rodger Polley September 26, 2004 12:10AM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

chile john September 30, 2004 10:55AM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Skip Luke September 27, 2004 01:05PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Jeff Ramsey September 27, 2004 08:26PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Rick Steele September 28, 2004 07:31AM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Skip Luke September 28, 2004 12:21PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Steve Stockham September 25, 2004 06:17PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Chris Weaver September 25, 2004 06:27PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Tim Schreiner September 25, 2004 08:18PM

If GLR Was Rewarded Contract...

Ed Kelley September 25, 2004 08:58PM

GLR screwed up when.......

in the know September 25, 2004 09:25PM

(Message Deleted by Poster)

Jim Poston September 25, 2004 10:10PM

Re: "In the NO", You Screwed Up When...

in the know September 25, 2004 10:23PM

Re: "In the NO", You Screwed Up When...

Karell Reader September 26, 2004 07:47AM

Greska Screwed Up When...

Don Richter September 26, 2004 09:06AM

Re: Greska Screwed Up When...

Karell Reader September 26, 2004 11:21AM

Re: Greska Screwed Up When...

Don Richter September 26, 2004 01:22PM

You Can't Win Every Hand Playing Poker *PIC*

roger hogan September 26, 2004 02:40PM

Argentine Central

narrow minded September 30, 2004 04:11AM

Re: Argentine Central

Stephen Peck October 01, 2004 08:21AM

Revisionist History Already!!

Steve Stockham September 26, 2004 09:18AM

Re: Revisionist History Already!!

WP&Ymike September 26, 2004 03:06PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Wooly September 26, 2004 08:02AM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Kerry Ann September 26, 2004 10:40AM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Mark Greksa September 26, 2004 03:31PM

Thank you

Don Richter September 26, 2004 04:01PM

yes, thank you

WP&Ymike September 26, 2004 04:16PM

Thank you Mr.Greksa

roger hogan September 26, 2004 04:37PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Wooly September 26, 2004 05:26PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

dan denham September 26, 2004 05:56PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Chris Weaver September 26, 2004 07:23PM

Thank you

Philip Walters September 26, 2004 09:07PM

Re: Why GLR Inc. Deserves to Go.

Stephen September 29, 2004 01:43AM

Sure - I could also join Al-Qaeda

Skip Luke September 28, 2004 12:12PM

Re: Sure - I could also join...

Mike Stillwell September 28, 2004 12:35PM

Re: Sure - I could also join...

Skip Luke September 28, 2004 07:33PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.