Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: DL&G 191

September 12, 2004 09:31PM
It seems that prioritys are set differently. Seems some pieces get put together very quickly while perhaps less popular ones sit. I have been patiently waiting for 191 to be cosmeticly restored since I first saw her in the early 70s. I don't buy the excuse that the boiler will disintigrate after a jacket is back on. I'm very confident that there is a solution to that problem. I also understand that politics kept 318 up on block for two decades. The museum has done some amazing and wonderful things, but 191 is one of the oldest engines in Colorado and deserves better.
Subject Author Posted

DL&G 191

Paul Gibbs September 11, 2004 01:57PM

Re: DL&G 191

Paul Hagglund September 11, 2004 04:31PM

Re: DL&G 191

Glen Brewer September 11, 2004 05:43PM

Re: DL&G 191

Paul Gibbs September 11, 2004 08:41PM

Re: DL&G 191

Tim Schreiner September 11, 2004 09:42PM

Re: DL&G 191

Tim Schreiner September 11, 2004 10:20PM

Re: DL&G 191 & CRRM

Rick Steele September 12, 2004 07:20AM

Re: DL&G 191 & CRRM

Paul Gibbs September 12, 2004 08:43AM

CRRM volunteers *LINK*

Dave S. September 12, 2004 10:12AM

Re: DL&G 191

rdmstr September 12, 2004 02:53PM

Re: DL&G 191

John Templeton-Chama Station Agent September 12, 2004 06:03PM

Re: DL&G 191 & Your Reply

Rick Steele September 12, 2004 07:32PM

Re: DL&G 191

Rick Steele September 12, 2004 07:34PM

Re: DL&G 191

Paul Gibbs September 12, 2004 07:54PM

Re: DL&G 191

Tim Schreiner September 12, 2004 09:31PM

Re: DL&G 191

rdmstr September 13, 2004 07:28PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.