Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile

Advanced

Re: Photos and article

January 24, 2004 01:46PM
I've seen Preston's original photos of the Whitehorse Engine House fire and it's clear that one of the ET&WNC engines was hardly damaged. WP&Y No. 51 'survived' OK and is now on display in Whitehorse and there's no evidence of fire damage. I think it was more of a case that the Alcan construction was winding down by the end of 44 and they had plenty of motive power at that time so there was no reason to restore 10 or 14. They just went onto the scrap line in Skagway with the others and when it came time to ship them all South to Auburn for scrapping, off they went.
There is no doubt that many of the engines sent for scrapping after the war could have been rebuilt, a number of the K-28s for sure, however there was very little interest in narrow gauge steam at that time. The D&RGW was given the best one # 472, but they had their 'noses out of joint' and refused it. The 'wisdom' of the time considered diesels the wave of the future and steam as obsolete. A lot of really ueseful stuff got trashed after the war just because of the attitude of the day.
Subject Author Posted

ET&WNC 10 & 14 *LINK*

WP&Ymike January 20, 2004 11:01PM

Re: ET&WNC 10 & 14

rick b January 21, 2004 01:53AM

There was a lot of confusion in those days.

Bruce Pryor January 21, 2004 09:44PM

Re: There was a lot of confusion in those days.

WP&Ymike January 22, 2004 12:42AM

it is Trains Sept '43

WP&Ymike January 22, 2004 12:53AM

Re: it is Trains Sept '43

rick b January 22, 2004 01:30AM

in WP&YR service Sept '42

WP&Ymike January 22, 2004 01:59AM

Re: There was a lot of confusion in those days.

rick b January 22, 2004 01:05AM

Re: There was a lot of confusion in those days.

WP&Ymike January 22, 2004 01:40AM

Re: There was a lot of confusion in those days.

rick b January 22, 2004 11:31AM

Photos and article *LINK*

Bruce Pryor January 22, 2004 08:09AM

Re: Photos and article

Tim S January 22, 2004 10:57PM

10 & 14 vs 190s

WP&Ymike January 23, 2004 02:35AM

Re: 190 tenderss

Brian Norden January 24, 2004 03:07PM

Re: 190 tenderss

Tim S January 24, 2004 11:00PM

Re: 190 tenders

WP&Ymike January 24, 2004 11:47PM

Re: 190 tenders

Tim S January 24, 2004 11:59PM

Re: 190 tenders

WP&Ymike January 25, 2004 12:27AM

190 oil tender photo

Bruce Pryor January 25, 2004 09:41PM

Re: 190 oil tender photo *LINK*

Brian Norden January 25, 2004 11:01PM

Re: 190 oil tender photo

WP&Ymike January 25, 2004 11:31PM

Re: 190 oil tender photo

Bruce Pryor January 26, 2004 06:37AM

Re: 190 oil tender photo *LINK*

Tim S January 26, 2004 03:15PM

Another 190 photo for Tim *NM* *PIC*

Bruce Pryor January 26, 2004 10:10PM

Re: Photos and article

Casey Carlson January 24, 2004 12:50PM

Re: Really.....

Jerry Huck January 24, 2004 01:34PM

Re: Really.....

Casey Carlson January 24, 2004 03:07PM

Re: Really.....

jbbane January 24, 2004 03:22PM

JB, you forgot

RBrinton January 24, 2004 05:56PM

Re: JB, you forgot

jbbane January 24, 2004 07:13PM

Re: JB, you forgot

Taylor Rush January 25, 2004 12:13PM

Re: JB, you forgot

jbbane January 25, 2004 06:04PM

Re: JB,That was Catapiller

RBrinton January 25, 2004 09:03PM

So I shouldn't mention

James R. Temple January 25, 2004 09:47PM

Don't go this far with the Heisler streamlining! *NM* *LINK* *PIC*

Bruce Pryor January 25, 2004 10:50PM

Re: Photos and article

WP&Ymike January 24, 2004 01:46PM

Re: Photos and article *LINK*

Tim S January 24, 2004 11:17PM

Re: Photos and article *PIC*

WP&Ymike January 25, 2004 12:18AM

Re: Photos and article

Tim S January 25, 2004 12:40AM

Engine House Registers

WP&Ymike January 25, 2004 12:50AM

Thanks, Mike

Bruce Pryor January 25, 2004 10:53PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.